</dependency>
  </dependencies>
  <build>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>..</directory>
        <includes>
          <include>LICENSE</include> <!-- copied from the parent pom because I couldn't figure out a way to make combine.children="append" work -->
          <include>proguard/*</include>
        </includes>
        <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <plugins>

         * an unchecked cast. We know, however, that the only possible value for
         * the type parameter is <E>, since otherwise the
         * MultiExceptionListIterator wouldn't be an Iterator<E>. The cast is
         * safe, even though javac can't tell.
         *
         * Sun bug 6665356 is an additional complication. Until OpenJDK 7, javac

   * cases where {@link Collection#contains} might throw {@link NullPointerException} or {@link
   * ClassCastException}.
   */
  // <? extends @Nullable Object> instead of <?> because of Kotlin b/189937072, discussed in Joiner.
  public static boolean contains(
      Iterable<? extends @Nullable Object> iterable, @CheckForNull Object element) {
    if (iterable instanceof Collection) {

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls

 * Kotlin code. In this class, nothing is publicly visible (nor exposed indirectly through a
 * publicly visible subclass), and I doubt any of our current or future Kotlin extensions for the
 * package will refer to the class. Plus, @ParametricNullness is only a temporary workaround,
 * anyway, so we just need to get by without the annotations here until Kotlin better understands
 * our other nullness annotations.

         * an unchecked cast. We know, however, that the only possible value for
         * the type parameter is <E>, since otherwise the
         * MultiExceptionListIterator wouldn't be an Iterator<E>. The cast is
         * safe, even though javac can't tell.
         *
         * Sun bug 6665356 is an additional complication. Until OpenJDK 7, javac

          if (hashTable[(knownRunStart + maxRunBeforeFallback - 1) & mask] == null) {
            // There are only maxRunBeforeFallback - 1 elements between here and there,
            // so even if they were all nonnull, we wouldn't detect a hash flood.  Therefore,
            // we can skip them all.
            knownRunStart += maxRunBeforeFallback;
          } else {

          // chains of SetFutures
          // Handling this special case is important because there is no way to pass an executor to
          // setFuture, so a user couldn't break the chain by doing this themselves.  It is also
          // potentially common if someone writes a recursive Futures.transformAsync transformer.
          future = setFuture.owner;

              .getMethod("currentRequestThreadFactory")
              .invoke(null);
    } catch (IllegalAccessException | ClassNotFoundException | NoSuchMethodException e) {
      throw new RuntimeException("Couldn't invoke ThreadManager.currentRequestThreadFactory", e);
    } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
      throw Throwables.propagate(e.getCause());
    }
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO

    </dependency>
  </dependencies>
  <build>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>..</directory>
        <includes>
          <include>LICENSE</include> <!-- copied from the parent pom because I couldn't figure out a way to make combine.children="append" work -->
          <include>proguard/*</include>
        </includes>
        <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <plugins>