* Iterables#filter(Iterable, Class)} for related functionality.)
   *
   * <p><b>{@code Stream} equivalent:</b> {@link java.util.stream.Stream#filter Stream.filter}.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): how can we omit that Iterables link when building gwt
  // javadoc?
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> Collection<E> filter(
      Collection<E> unfiltered, Predicate<? super E> predicate) {

  //         for (int i = 0; i < iters; ++i) {
  //             junit.textui.TestRunner.run(s);
  //             System.gc();
  //             System.runFinalization();
  //         }
  //         System.exit(0);
  //     }

  //     public static TestSuite newTestSuite(Object... suiteOrClasses) {
  //         TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
  //         for (Object suiteOrClass : suiteOrClasses) {

      for (int i = 0, n = origStackTrace.length; i < n; i++) {
        if (WithExplicitOrdering.class.getName().equals(origStackTrace[i].getClassName())) {
          // For pre-populated disallowedPriorLocks edges, omit the stack trace.
          setStackTrace(EMPTY_STACK_TRACE);
          break;
        }
        if (!EXCLUDED_CLASS_NAMES.contains(origStackTrace[i].getClassName())) {

   * finally block.
   *
   * Further optimizations of this algorithm become increasingly subtle. A wait that terminates
   * without the guard being satisfied (due to timeout, but not interrupt) can then immediately exit
   * the monitor without signalling. If it timed out without being signalled, it does not need to
   * "pass on" the signal to another thread. If it *was* signalled, then its guard must have been

   *
   * <p>That iterator supports {@code remove()} if {@code iterable.iterator()} does. After {@code
   * remove()} is called, subsequent cycles omit the removed element, which is no longer in {@code
   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *

    service.startAsync().awaitRunning();
    assertTrue(service.startUpCalled);
    assertEquals(Service.State.RUNNING, service.state());

    exitRun.countDown(); // the service will exit voluntarily
    executionThread.join();

    assertTrue(service.shutDownCalled);
    assertEquals(Service.State.TERMINATED, service.state());

    service.stopAsync().awaitTerminated(); // no-op

  //         for (int i = 0; i < iters; ++i) {
  //             junit.textui.TestRunner.run(s);
  //             System.gc();
  //             System.runFinalization();
  //         }
  //         System.exit(0);
  //     }

  //     public static TestSuite newTestSuite(Object... suiteOrClasses) {
  //         TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
  //         for (Object suiteOrClass : suiteOrClasses) {

          // So if value changed (and it did since we lost the CAS), then it cannot be null and
          // since it isn't a SetFuture, then the future must be done and we should exit the loop
          break;
        }
      }
    }
    return rValue;
  }

  /**
   * Subclasses can override this method to implement interruption of the future's computation. The

   * Iterables#filter(Iterable, Class)} for related functionality.)
   *
   * <p><b>{@code Stream} equivalent:</b> {@link java.util.stream.Stream#filter Stream.filter}.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): how can we omit that Iterables link when building gwt
  // javadoc?
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> Collection<E> filter(
      Collection<E> unfiltered, Predicate<? super E> predicate) {

   * java.util.stream.Stream#filter}. This method is not being deprecated, but we gently encourage
   * you to migrate to streams.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): how to omit that last sentence when building GWT javadoc?
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> Set<E> filter(
      Set<E> unfiltered, Predicate<? super E> predicate) {
    if (unfiltered instanceof SortedSet) {