* for {@code minimumBits}, will return identically-behaving {@link HashFunction} instances.
   *
   * @param minimumBits a positive integer. This can be arbitrarily large. The returned {@link
   *     HashFunction} instance may use memory proportional to this integer.
   * @return a hash function, described above, that produces hash codes of length {@code
   *     minimumBits} or greater
   */

      }
    }
    Arrays.fill(contents, uniques, n, null);
    if (uniques < contents.length / 2) {
      // Deduplication eliminated many of the elements.  We don't want to retain an arbitrarily
      // large array relative to the number of elements, so we cap the ratio.
      contents = Arrays.copyOf(contents, uniques);
    }
    return new RegularImmutableSortedSet<E>(

 * if/throw idiom instead.
 *
 * <p>Depending on your message arguments, memory may be allocated for boxing and varargs array
 * creation. However, the methods of this class have a large number of overloads that prevent such
 * allocations in many common cases.
 *
 * <p>The message string is not formatted unless the exception will be thrown, so the cost of the
 * string formatting itself should not be a concern.

     */
    abstract SetBuilderImpl<E> copy();

    /**
     * Call this before build(). Does a final check on the internal data structures, e.g. shrinking
     * unnecessarily large structures or detecting previously unnoticed hash flooding.
     */
    SetBuilderImpl<E> review() {
      return this;
    }

    abstract ImmutableSet<E> build();
  }

   * ranges {@code [3..3)} and {@code [4..4)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large
   * range set (such as {@code ImmutableRangeSet.of(Range.greaterThan(0))}). Certain operations on
   * such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link

   * ranges {@code [3..3)} and {@code [4..4)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large
   * range set (such as {@code ImmutableRangeSet.of(Range.greaterThan(0))}). Certain operations on
   * such a set can be performed efficiently, but others (such as {@link Set#hashCode} or {@link

  }

  public void testFindLast_refStream() {
    assertThat(findLast(Stream.of())).isEmpty();
    assertThat(findLast(Stream.of("a", "b", "c", "d"))).hasValue("d");

    // test with a large, not-subsized Spliterator
    List<Integer> list =
        IntStream.rangeClosed(0, 10000).boxed().collect(Collectors.toCollection(LinkedList::new));
    assertThat(findLast(list.stream())).hasValue(10000);

    checkNotNull(iterator);
    checkNonnegative(k, "k");

    if (k == 0 || !iterator.hasNext()) {
      return Collections.emptyList();
    } else if (k >= Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2) {
      // k is really large; just do a straightforward sorted-copy-and-sublist
      ArrayList<E> list = Lists.newArrayList(iterator);
      Collections.sort(list, this);
      if (list.size() > k) {
        list.subList(k, list.size()).clear();

        tableSize <<= 1;
      }
      return tableSize;
    }

    // The table can't be completely full or we'll get infinite reprobes
    checkArgument(setSize < MAX_TABLE_SIZE, "collection too large");
    return MAX_TABLE_SIZE;
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable set containing each of {@code elements}, minus duplicates, in the order
   * each appears first in the source collection.
   *

      // path when the first operation on the new map is putAll(otherMap). There, prior to
      // https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3e393047e12147a81e2899784b943923fc34da8e, a bug
      // meant that sometimes a too-large threshold is calculated. However, this new threshold is
      // independent of the initial capacity, except that it won't be lower than the threshold