}

    generateFinish() {
        const finish = document.createElement('a')
        finish.onclick = (e) => {
            e.preventDefault()
            this.lineDelay = 0
            this.typeDelay = 0
            this.startDelay = 0
        }
        finish.href = '#'
        finish.setAttribute('data-terminal-control', '')
        finish.innerHTML = "fast →"
        this.finishElement = finish

Then the cashier 💁 says "I'm finished with doing the burgers" by putting your number on the counter's display, but you don't jump like crazy immediately when the displayed number changes to your turn number. You know no one will steal your burgers because you have the number of your turn, and they have theirs.

### `startup` and `shutdown` together

There's a high chance that the logic for your *startup* and *shutdown* is connected, you might want to start something and then finish it, acquire a resource and then release it, etc.

Doing that in separated functions that don't share logic or variables together is more difficult as you would need to store values in global variables or similar tricks.

Cela prendrait autant de temps pour finir avec ou sans sections (concurrence) et vous auriez effectué la même quantité de travail.

Mais dans ce cas, si pouviez amener 8 ex-serveurs/cuisiniers/devenus-nettoyeurs 👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳, et que chacun d'eux (plus vous) pouvait prendre une zone de la maison pour la nettoyer, vous pourriez faire tout le travail en parallèle, et finir plus tôt.

        else:
            logging.info(
                f"There doesn't seem to be anything to be done about PR #{pr.number}"
            )

    logging.info("Creating PR")
    pr = repo.create_pull(title=message, body=message, base="master", head=branch_name)
    logging.info(f"Created PR: {pr.number}")

This was designed this way mainly to allow using the same objects "yielded" by dependencies inside of background tasks, because the exit code would be executed after the background tasks were finished.

Nevertheless, as this would mean waiting for the response to travel through the network while unnecessarily holding a resource in a dependency with yield (for example a database connection), this was changed in FastAPI 0.106.0.

    assert middleware_state["context_b"] == "finished b with a: started a"
    assert middleware_state["context_a"] == "finished a"
    assert middleware_state["bg"] == "not set"
    assert state["context_b"] == "finished b with a: started a"
    assert state["context_a"] == "finished a"
    assert state["bg"] == "bg set - b: finished b with a: started a - a: finished a"


def test_sync_raise_raises():

1. This is the generator function. It's a "generator function" because it contains `yield` statements inside.
2. By using a `with` block, we make sure that the file-like object is closed after the generator function is done. So, after it finishes sending the response.
3. This `yield from` tells the function to iterate over that thing named `file_like`. And then, for each part iterated, yield that part as coming from this generator function.

This was designed this way mainly to allow using the same objects "yielded" by dependencies inside of background tasks, because the exit code would be executed after the background tasks were finished.

Nevertheless, as this would mean waiting for the response to travel through the network while unnecessarily holding a resource in a dependency with yield (for example a database connection), this was changed in FastAPI 0.106.0.