assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }
  }

  public void testIntersection_general() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.closed(4, 8);

    // separate below
    try {
      range.intersection(Range.closed(0, 2));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }

    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());

    <version>HEAD-jre-SNAPSHOT</version>
  </parent>
  <artifactId>guava-tests</artifactId>
  <name>Guava Unit Tests</name>
  <description>
    The unit tests for the Guava libraries - separated into a
    separate artifact to allow for the testlibs to depend on guava
    itself.
  </description>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId>
      <artifactId>guava-testlib</artifactId>

  public void testNoNewApis() throws Exception {
    assertWithMessage(
            "Do not add new methods to ListenableFuture. Its API needs to continue to match the"
                + " version we released in a separate artifact com.google.guava:listenablefuture.")
        .that(ListenableFuture.class.getDeclaredMethods())
        .asList()
        .containsExactly(

  public void testNoNewApis() throws Exception {
    assertWithMessage(
            "Do not add new methods to ListenableFuture. Its API needs to continue to match the"
                + " version we released in a separate artifact com.google.guava:listenablefuture.")
        .that(ListenableFuture.class.getDeclaredMethods())
        .asList()
        .containsExactly(

    assertThrows(CancellationException.class, () -> resultFuture.get());
  }

  public void testFutureCancellableBeforeFunctionCompletion() throws Exception {
    // Set the result in a separate thread since this test runs the function
    // (which will block) in the same thread.
    new Thread() {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        inputFuture.set(SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA);
      }

      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }
  }

  public void testIntersection_general() {
    Range<Integer> range = Range.closed(4, 8);

    // separate below
    try {
      range.intersection(Range.closed(0, 2));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }

import java.util.Set;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * An immutable sorted set with one or more elements. TODO(jlevy): Consider separate class for a
 * single-element sorted set.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(serializable = true, emulated = true)
@SuppressWarnings({"serial", "rawtypes"})

    assertThrows(CancellationException.class, () -> resultFuture.get());
  }

  public void testFutureCancellableBeforeFunctionCompletion() throws Exception {
    // Set the result in a separate thread since this test runs the function
    // (which will block) in the same thread.
    new Thread() {
      @Override
      public void run() {
        inputFuture.set(SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA);
      }

     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for
     * a given entry might not include null. The right fix for the header problems is probably to
     * define a separate MultimapLink interface with a separate "header" implementation, which
     * hopefully could avoid implementing Entry or ValueSetLink at all. (But note that that approach