</dependency>

  </dependencies>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <tasks><echo>${project.parent.basedir}</echo></tasks>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>

    </dependency>

  </dependencies>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <tasks><echo>${project.parent.basedir}</echo></tasks>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>

    </dependency>

  </dependencies>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <tasks><echo>${project.parent.basedir}</echo></tasks>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>

    }

    /**
     * This method produces "surrogate" type registry that is static: it aims users that want to use
     * Maven-Resolver without involving Maven Core and related things.
     * <p>
     * This type registry is NOT used by Maven Core: Maven replaces it during Session creation with a type registry
     * that supports extending it (i.e. via Maven Extensions).
     * <p>

     *         unknown.
     */
    Set<Plugin> getPluginsBoundByDefaultToAllLifecycles(String packaging);

    MavenExecutionPlan calculateExecutionPlan(MavenSession session, String... tasks)
            throws PluginNotFoundException, PluginResolutionException, PluginDescriptorParsingException,
                    MojoNotFoundException, NoPluginFoundForPrefixException, InvalidPluginDescriptorException,

 * There should be no big surprises here, although you may notice that the methods accept
 * <code>java.lang.CharSequence</code> rather than <code>java.lang.String</code>. This is provided mainly as a
 * convenience, to enable developers to pass things like <code>java.lang.StringBuffer</code> directly into the logger,
 * rather than formatting first by calling <code>toString()</code>.
 *
 *
 * @deprecated Use SLF4J directly
 */
@Deprecated

        ArtifactResolutionResult result = resolve(request);

        // We have collected all the problems so let's mimic the way the old code worked and just blow up right here.
        // That's right lets just let it rip right here and send a big incomprehensible blob of text at unsuspecting
        // users. Bad dog!

        resolutionErrorHandler.throwErrors(request, result);

        return result;

                new PropertiesAsMap(((DefaultProject) project).getProject().getProperties()));
    }

    @Override
    public Optional<Project> getExecutionProject(Project project) {
        // Session keep tracks of the Project per project id,
        // so we cannot use session.getProject(p) for forked projects
        // which are temporary clones
        return Optional.ofNullable(getMavenProject(project).getExecutionProject())

* Maven packaging and lifecycle
* Maven test harness for plugin execution model
* Eclipse IDE tooling for plugin execution model and metadata model

- we also seem to have information like the plugin lifecycle model that's buried inside the maven execution model
- we also seem to have artifact information tangled inside the plugin model
- we have to deal with scripting implementations (groovy, beanshell, ruby)

            <type>String</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <comment>We could probably have a specific element for a dev mailing list for things like CI,
        and maybe even a specific element for the user and scm mailing lists. Then leave the more
        lose structure for any other type of mailing list.</comment>
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>