* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

The *Build Tool Team* has decided to use Architectural Decision Records (aka ADR) to track decisions we want to follow.

The main logic with ADRs is to describe (architectural) decisions made:

* To provide best practices and solutions we (as the *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.

    <scm>
        <connection>scm:git:git://github.com/junit-team/junit4.git</connection>
        <developerConnection>scm:git:******@****.***:junit-team/junit4.git</developerConnection>
        <url>https://github.com/junit-team/junit4</url>
      <tag>r4.13.1</tag>
  </scm>
    <issueManagement>
        <system>github</system>
        <url>https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/issues</url>
    </issueManagement>
    <ciManagement>

An architecture module is responsible for providing a coherent set of features and:

- Provides a set of APIs and services for use from outside the module.
- Has a private implementation.
- Is owned by a single team. A team may own multiple architecture modules.

The modules are arranged into several different "Gradle platforms".
A Gradle platform is a logical distribution that provides support for a specific kind of automation.

 * failing tasks only, to not use up unnecessary disk space on Team City. This also improves the performance of
 * artifact publishing by reducing the artifacts and packaging reports that consist of multiple files.
 *
 * Reducing the number of reports also makes it easier to find the important ones when analysing a failed build in
 * Team City.
 */

This directory contains documentation that describes Gradle's architecture and how the various pieces fit together and work.

## Architecture decision records (ADRs)

The Gradle team uses ADRs to record architectural decisions that the team has made.

See [Architecture decisions records](standards) for the list of ADRs.

- Better security: separate Istio components reside in different namespaces, allowing different teams or
roles to manage different parts of Istio. For example, a security team would maintain the
root CA and policy, a telemetry team may only have access to Prometheus,
and a different team may maintain the control plane components (which are highly security sensitive).

The install is organized in 'environments' - each environment consists of a set of components

	[http.Request]                     # symbol documentation; auto-linked as in Go doc strings
	[#12345](/issue/12345)             # GitHub issues
	[CL 6789](/cl/6789)                # Gerrit changelists

## For the release team

At the start of a release development cycle, the contents of `next` should be deleted
and replaced with those of `initial`. From the repo root:

    > cd doc
    > rm -r next/*
    > cp -r initial/* next

## GitHub docs: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners
##
## CODEOWNERS style rules:
## 1. Prefer team ownership over individual user ownership.
## 2. GBT-related team should be listed first.
## 3. Try to keep paths alphabetically sorted within visual groups.
## 4. List individual owners last.
##

# bt-unassigned-maintainers must be the first owner

version of the Go compiler (that uses BoringCrypto, from BoringSSL, which is [FIPS 140-2 validated](https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/documents/security-policies/140sp2964.pdf)) published by the Golang Team [here](https://github.com/golang/go/tree/dev.boringcrypto/misc/boring).

MinIO FIPS executables are available at <http://dl.min.io> - they are only published for `linux-amd64` architecture as binary files with the suffix `.fips`. We also publish...

[@devinfra](https://github.com/orgs/tensorflow/teams/devinfra)

********************************************************************************

A directory for build and CI related scripts and jobs managed by the TensorFlow