* IllegalArgumentException} if passed a {@code fromKey} less than an earlier {@code fromKey}.
   * However, this method doesn't throw an exception in that situation, but instead keeps the
   * original {@code fromKey}. Similarly, this method keeps the original {@code toKey}, instead of
   * throwing an exception, if passed a {@code toKey} greater than an earlier {@code toKey}.
   */
  @Override

   * IllegalArgumentException} if passed a {@code fromKey} less than an earlier {@code fromKey}.
   * However, this method doesn't throw an exception in that situation, but instead keeps the
   * original {@code fromKey}. Similarly, this method keeps the original {@code toKey}, instead of
   * throwing an exception, if passed a {@code toKey} greater than an earlier {@code toKey}.
   */
  @Override

		NumVersions: 4,
	}

	event := lc.eval(opts, time.Time{})
	if event.Action != TransitionAction {
		t.Fatalf("Expected %v action but got %v", TransitionAction, event.Action)
	}
	// The earlier upcoming lifecycle event must be picked, i.e rule with id "Transition-10"
	if exp := ExpectedExpiryTime(opts.ModTime, 10); exp != event.Due {
		t.Fatalf("Expected due %v but got %v, ruleID=%v", exp, event.Due, event.RuleID)
	}

	possibleDests := len(vs.Spec.Http) + len(vs.Spec.Tls) + len(vs.Spec.Tcp)
	if matches < possibleDests {
		// We've printed the match conditions.  We can't say for sure that matching
		// traffic will reach this pod, because an earlier match condition could have captured it.
		fmt.Fprintf(writer, "%s%d additional destination(s) that will not reach this pod\n",
			printSpaces(initPrintNum+printLevel1), possibleDests-matches)

    enableTlsWithTunnel()
    server.protocols = Arrays.asList(Protocol.HTTP_2, Protocol.HTTP_1_1)
    timeToFirstByte()
  }

  /**
   * Test to confirm that events are reported at the time they occur and no earlier and no later.
   * This inserts a bunch of synthetic 250 ms delays into both client and server and confirms that
   * the same delays make it back into the events.
   *

        // We only check for groupId/artifactId/version/classifier cause if there is another
        // module with the same groupId/artifactId/version/classifier this will fail the build
        // earlier like "Project '...' is duplicated in the reactor.
        // So it is sufficient to check only groupId/artifactId/version/classifier and not the
        // packaging type.
        for (Dependency dependency : dependencies) {

  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also
  //    definitely observe all earlier writes, but we still have no guarantee that done() would see
  //    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html

    methods track the system's local time when network calls are made. These
    replace the `OkHttp-Sent-Millis` and `OkHttp-Received-Millis` headers that were
    present in earlier versions of OkHttp.
 *  New: Accept user-provided trust managers in `OkHttpClient.Builder`. This
    allows OkHttp to satisfy its TLS requirements directly. Otherwise OkHttp

			continue
		}

		switch filename {
		case "completed":
			// Strictly speaking, there is no guarantee that seeing the error at completed:1
			// (at the end of the file) means we've seen all the errors from earlier in the file,
			// but usually it does. Certainly if we don't see the completed:1 error, we did
			// not get all the errors we expected.
			completed = true

		case "not-declared":
			sniff[i] |= notDeclared

  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also
  //    definitely observe all earlier writes, but we still have no guarantee that done() would see
  //    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html