Use:   "rootca-compare [pod/]<name-1>[.<namespace-1>] [pod/]<name-2>[.<namespace-2>]",
		Short: "Compare ROOTCA values for the two given pods",
		Long:  `Compare ROOTCA values for given 2 pods to check the connectivity between them.`,
		Example: `  # Compare ROOTCA values for given 2 pods to check the connectivity between them.
  istioctl proxy-config rootca-compare <pod-name-1[.namespace]> <pod-name-2[.namespace]>`,

ommandLineParser$CaseInsensitiveStrin.class package org.apache.maven.wrapper.cli; final synchronized class CommandLineParser$CaseInsensitiveStrin implements java.util.Comparator { private void CommandLineParser$CaseInsensitiveStrin(); public int compare(String, String); } org/apache/maven/wrapper/cli/CommandLineParser$KnownOptionParserSta.class package org.apache.maven.wrapper.cli; synchronized class CommandLineParser$KnownOptionParserSta extends CommandLineParser$OptionParserState { private final...

 * Comparator} or {@link Comparable} type whose comparison behavior is <i>inconsistent with
 * equals</i>. That is, {@code a.compareTo(b)} or {@code comparator.compare(a, b)} should equal zero
 * <i>if and only if</i> {@code a.equals(b)}. If this advice is not followed, the resulting map will
 * not correctly obey its specification.
 *

          for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
            // We're careful to put only K instances in.
            if (i > 0 && comparator.compare((K) sortedKeys[i - 1], (K) sortedKeys[i]) == 0) {
              throw new IllegalArgumentException(
                  "keys required to be distinct but compared as equal: "
                      + sortedKeys[i - 1]
                      + " and "
                      + sortedKeys[i]);
            }

    EXPECT_EQ(TF_OK, TF_GetCode(s_)) << TF_Message(s_);

    // Compare that the graphs match.
    GraphDef expected_gdef;
    GraphDef gdef;
    EXPECT_TRUE(GetGraphDef(expected_graph_, &expected_gdef));
    EXPECT_TRUE(GetGraphDef(graph_, &gdef));
    TF_EXPECT_GRAPH_EQ(expected_gdef, gdef);

    // Compare that the output of the gradients of both graphs match.

		},
		{
			name:       "compare-mixed",
			query:      `SELECT id from s3object s WHERE value = true`,
			wantResult: `{"id":1}`,
			withJSON: `{"id":0, "value": false}
{"id":1, "value": true}
{"id":2, "value": 42}
{"id":3, "value": "true"}
`,
		},
		{
			name:       "compare-mixed-not",
			query:      `SELECT COUNT(id) as n from s3object s WHERE value != true`,

	// Prefer lower types
	if x.Type != o.Type {
		return x.Type < o.Type
	}
	// Consistent sort on signature
	if v := bytes.Compare(x.Signature[:], o.Signature[:]); v != 0 {
		return v > 0
	}
	// On ID mismatch
	if v := bytes.Compare(x.VersionID[:], o.VersionID[:]); v != 0 {
		return v > 0
	}
	// Flags
	if x.Flags != o.Flags {
		return x.Flags > o.Flags
	}
	return false
}

     * address if the server. The hashing function uses the hashcode of the
     * server address, the canonical representation of the URL, and does not
     * compare authentication information. In essence, two
     * <code>SmbFile</code> objects that refer to
     * the same file should generate the same hashcode provided it is possible
     * to make such a determination.
     *

    if (set.comparator() != null
        && set.comparator() != Ordering.natural()
        && range.hasLowerBound()
        && range.hasUpperBound()) {
      checkArgument(
          set.comparator().compare(range.lowerEndpoint(), range.upperEndpoint()) <= 0,
          "set is using a custom comparator which is inconsistent with the natural ordering.");
    }
    if (range.hasLowerBound() && range.hasUpperBound()) {

      // to be sorted based on the top of each iterator.
      Comparator<PeekingIterator<T>> heapComparator =
          (PeekingIterator<T> o1, PeekingIterator<T> o2) ->
              itemComparator.compare(o1.peek(), o2.peek());

      queue = new PriorityQueue<>(2, heapComparator);

      for (Iterator<? extends T> iterator : iterators) {
        if (iterator.hasNext()) {