<div class="form-group row">
                                    <span class="font-weight-bold col-sm-3 text-sm-right col-form-label"><la:message
                                            key="labels.web_api_json_enabled"/></span>
                                    <div class="form-inline col-sm-9">
                                        <la:errors property="webApiJson"/>

    responses returned by OkHttp itself, and it was an old mistake to permit
    application code to omit a message.

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

	err = client.MakeBucket(ctx, getRandomBucketName(), minio.MakeBucketOptions{})
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("user could not create bucket: %v", err)
	}

	// 4. Check that user can be disabled and verify it.
	err = s.adm.SetUserStatus(ctx, accessKey, madmin.AccountDisabled)
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("could not set user account to disabled")
	}
	usersMap, err = s.adm.ListUsers(ctx)
	if err != nil {

                is.setEncoding(responseData.getCharSet());
            }
            parser.parse(is);
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            throw new CrawlingAccessException("Could not parse " + responseData.getUrl(), e);
        }

        final Document document = parser.getDocument();

        processMetaRobots(responseData, resultData, document);

        } catch (Exception e) {
            log.debug("Could not cleanup target file", e);
        }

        Thread.sleep(200);
        SmbFile dirToClean = new SmbFile(baseUrl + "shared/movedir_" + timestamp + "/", cleanupContext);
        try {
            dirToClean.delete();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            log.debug("Could not cleanup directory", e);
        }
    }

    @Test

        // Could trigger failover logic here
    }

    /**
     * Handle node available events
     */
    private void handleNodeAvailable(WitnessNotification notification) {
        log.info("Node available: {}", notification.getResourceName());
        // Node is back online - could rebalance connections
    }

    /**

	}
	var arns []string
	for arn := range sys.rolesMap {
		arns = append(arns, arn.String())
	}
	sort.Strings(arns)
	msgs := make([]string, 0, len(arns))
	for _, arn := range arns {
		msgs = append(msgs, color.Bold(arn))
	}

	logger.Info(fmt.Sprintf("%s %s", color.Blue("IAM Roles:"), strings.Join(msgs, " ")))
}

// HasWatcher - returns if the IAM system has a watcher to be notified of
// changes.

                throw new SsoLoginException("could not validate nonce");
            }

            final String nonce = (String) claimsSet.getClaim("nonce");
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("nonce={}", nonce);
            }
            if (StringUtils.isEmpty(nonce) || !nonce.equals(stateData.getNonce())) {
                throw new SsoLoginException("could not validate nonce");
            }

   * @Nullable X>, then users might pass a TypeParameter<Y>, where Y is a subtype of X, while still
   * passing a TypeToken<X>. This would be invalid. Maybe we could accept a TypeParameter<@PolyNull
   * X> if we support such a thing? It would be weird or misleading for users to be able to pass
   * `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}` and have it act as a plain `TypeParameter<T>`, but

   * use soft, weak, or phantom references.
   *
   * @param map place to store the mapping from each key to its corresponding values
   * @param factory supplier of new, empty collections that will each hold all values for a given
   *     key
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code map} is not empty
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> Multimap<K, V> newMultimap(