public void setInitials_Terms(ConditionOptionCall<TermsAggregationBuilder> opLambda) {
        setInitials_Terms("initials", opLambda, null);
    }

    public void setInitials_Terms(ConditionOptionCall<TermsAggregationBuilder> opLambda, OperatorCall<BsUserCA> aggsLambda) {
        setInitials_Terms("initials", opLambda, aggsLambda);
    }

    assertThat(map.ticker).isSameInstanceAs(NULL_TICKER);

    assertThat(map.concurrencyLevel).isEqualTo(4);

    // concurrency level
    assertThat(map.segments).hasLength(4);
    // initial capacity / concurrency level
    assertThat(map.segments[0].table.length()).isEqualTo(16 / map.segments.length);

    assertThat(map.evictsBySize()).isFalse();
    assertThat(map.expires()).isFalse();

    assertThat(map.ticker).isSameInstanceAs(NULL_TICKER);

    assertThat(map.concurrencyLevel).isEqualTo(4);

    // concurrency level
    assertThat(map.segments).hasLength(4);
    // initial capacity / concurrency level
    assertThat(map.segments[0].table.length()).isEqualTo(16 / map.segments.length);

    assertThat(map.evictsBySize()).isFalse();
    assertThat(map.expires()).isFalse();

      Map<? extends K, ? extends V> map) {
    return new HashMap<>(map);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@code HashMap} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it <i>should</i>
   * hold {@code expectedSize} elements without growth. This behavior cannot be broadly guaranteed,
   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method

      Map<? extends K, ? extends V> map) {
    return new HashMap<>(map);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@code HashMap} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it <i>should</i>
   * hold {@code expectedSize} elements without growth. This behavior cannot be broadly guaranteed,
   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method

      // 408's are a bit of an outlier because we may repeat the request if we encounter this
      // response code. In this scenario, there are 2 responses: the initial 408 and then the 200
      // because of the retry. We just want to ensure the initial 408 isn't cached.
      expectedResponseCode = 200
      server.enqueue(
        MockResponse
          .Builder()
          .setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-store")

* Added configurable etcd initial-cluster-state to kube-up script ([#41320](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41320), [@jszczepkowski](https://github.com/jszczepkowski))

    public static final String LABELS_POST_OFFICE_BOX = "{labels.postOfficeBox}";

    /** The key of the message: Initials */
    public static final String LABELS_user_initials = "{labels.user_initials}";

    /** The key of the message: Initials */
    public static final String LABELS_INITIALS = "{labels.initials}";

    /** The key of the message: Car License */

   * its capacity threshold.
   *
   * The Least Recently Used page replacement algorithm was chosen due to its simplicity, high hit
   * rate, and ability to be implemented with O(1) time complexity. The initial LRU implementation
   * operates per-segment rather than globally for increased implementation simplicity. We expect
   * the cache hit rate to be similar to that of a global LRU algorithm.
   */

  // Constants

* x509 authenticator: get groups from subject's organization field ([#30392](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30392), [@ericchiang](https://github.com/ericchiang))
* Add initial support for TokenFile to the client config file. ([#29696](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29696), [@brendandburns](https://github.com/brendandburns))