*
     * @param index     the index name
     * @param condition the search condition
     * @return an optional containing the document if found
     */
    public OptionalEntity<Map<String, Object>> getDocument(final String index, final SearchCondition<SearchRequestBuilder> condition) {
        return getDocument(index, condition, (response, hit) -> {

            file existence, etc.), Maven now supports a powerful condition-based activation
            through the {@code condition} field. This new mechanism allows for more flexible
            and expressive profile activation rules.</p>

            <h2>Condition Syntax</h2>

            <p>The condition is specified as a string expression that can include various

      "Action":     "s3:GetObject",
      "Resource":    "arn:aws:s3:::%s/*",
      "Condition": {  "StringEquals": {"s3:ExistingObjectTag/security": "public" } }
    },
    {
      "Effect":     "Allow",
      "Action":     "s3:DeleteObjectTagging",
      "Resource":    "arn:aws:s3:::%s/*",
      "Condition": {  "StringEquals": {"s3:ExistingObjectTag/security": "public" } }
    },
    {

  }

  /** @return the request with the conditional get headers. */
  private fun assertConditionallyCached(response: MockResponse): RecordedRequest {
    // scenario 1: condition succeeds
    server.enqueue(
      response
        .newBuilder()
        .body("A")
        .status("HTTP/1.1 200 A-OK")
        .build(),
    )
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse

    /** The key of the message: Condition */
    public static final String LABELS_boost_document_rule_list_url_expr = "{labels.boost_document_rule_list_url_expr}";

    /** The key of the message: Condition */
    public static final String LABELS_boost_document_rule_url_expr = "{labels.boost_document_rule_url_expr}";

- DRA device taints: `DeviceTaintRule` status provides information about the rule, including whether Pods still need to be evicted (`EvictionInProgress` condition). The newly added `None` effect can be used to preview what a `DeviceTaintRule` would do if it used the `NoExecute` effect and to taint devices (`device health`) without immediately affecting scheduling or running Pods. ([#134152](https://github...

    public static final String ERRORS_failed_to_send_testmail = "{errors.failed_to_send_testmail}";

    /** The key of the message: The specified query has an unknown condition. */
    public static final String ERRORS_invalid_query_unknown = "{errors.invalid_query_unknown}";

    /** The key of the message: The given query is invalid. */

* Fix possible panic in PodAffinityChecker ([#33086](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33086), [@ivan4th](https://github.com/ivan4th))
* Fix race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag  ([#32807](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/32807), [@jingxu97](https://github.com/jingxu97))

* Move HighWaterMark to the top of the struct in order to fix arm, second time ([#33376](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33376), [@luxas](https://github.com/luxas))
* Fix race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag  ([#32807](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/32807), [@jingxu97](https://github.com/jingxu97))

		if resetID != "" && oi.ModTime.Before(resetBeforeDate) { // trigger replication if `mc replicate reset` requested
			rd.Replicate = true
			return rd
		}
		// For existing object reset - this condition is needed
		rd.Replicate = tgtStatus == ""
		return rd
	}
	if resetID == "" || resetBeforeDate.Equal(timeSentinel) { // no reset in progress
		return rd
	}