}
  }

  /**
   * Any object can be the result of a Future, and not every object has a reasonable toString()
   * implementation. Using a reconstruction of the default Object.toString() prevents OOMs and stack
   * overflows, and helps avoid sensitive data inadvertently ending up in exception messages.
   */

errors.failed_to_upgrade_from=Échec de la mise à niveau depuis {0}.
errors.failed_to_reindex=Échec du démarrage de la réindexation de {0} à {1}.
errors.failed_to_rebuild_config_index=Échec de la reconstruction des index de configuration.
errors.no_target_index_selected=Veuillez sélectionner au moins un index cible à reconstruire.
errors.operation_already_running=L'opération est déjà en cours d'exécution sur {0}.

Docker et des outils similaires utilisent également un **cache interne** lors de la construction de l'image : si un fichier n'a pas changé depuis la dernière construction de l'image de conteneur, alors il va **réutiliser la même couche** créée la dernière fois, au lieu de recopier le fichier et créer une nouvelle couche à partir de zéro.

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code long[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

    MemoizingSupplier(Supplier<T> delegate) {
      this.delegate = checkNotNull(delegate);
    }

    @Override
    @ParametricNullness
    // We set the field only once (during construction or deserialization).
    @SuppressWarnings("SynchronizeOnNonFinalField")
    public T get() {
      // A 2-field variant of Double Checked Locking.
      if (!initialized) {
        synchronized (lock) {

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code double[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code double[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code int[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code ArrayTable} is rarely the {@link Table} implementation you want. First,
 * it requires that the complete universe of rows and columns be specified at construction time.
 * Second, it is always backed by an array large enough to hold a value for every possible
 * combination of row and column keys. (This is rarely optimal unless the table is extremely dense.)

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code ArrayTable} is rarely the {@link Table} implementation you want. First,
 * it requires that the complete universe of rows and columns be specified at construction time.
 * Second, it is always backed by an array large enough to hold a value for every possible
 * combination of row and column keys. (This is rarely optimal unless the table is extremely dense.)

##### Figure 1 - Secure Channel construction

```