assertEquals(
        HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal("!!!".getBytes(UTF_8))),
        Hashing.hmacSha1(SHA1_KEY)
            .newHasher()
            .putString("hello", UTF_8)
            .putString("world", UTF_8)
            .putString("!!!", UTF_8)
            .hash());
  }

  public void testCustomKey() throws Exception {
    SecretKey customKey =
        new SecretKey() {
          @Override

    assertEquals(
        HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal("!!!".getBytes(UTF_8))),
        Hashing.hmacSha1(SHA1_KEY)
            .newHasher()
            .putString("hello", UTF_8)
            .putString("world", UTF_8)
            .putString("!!!", UTF_8)
            .hash());
  }

  public void testCustomKey() throws Exception {
    SecretKey customKey =
        new SecretKey() {
          @Override

   * hashUnencodedChars}.
   *
   * @since 15.0 (since 11.0 as hashString(CharSequence)).
   */
  HashCode hashUnencodedChars(CharSequence input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putString(input, charset).hash()}. Characters are encoded using
   * the given {@link Charset}. The implementation <i>might</i> perform better than its longhand
   * equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *

   * hashUnencodedChars}.
   *
   * @since 15.0 (since 11.0 as hashString(CharSequence)).
   */
  HashCode hashUnencodedChars(CharSequence input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putString(input, charset).hash()}. Characters are encoded using
   * the given {@link Charset}. The implementation <i>might</i> perform better than its longhand
   * equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *

        hashFunction.newHasher().putUnencodedChars(string).hash());
    for (Charset charset : CHARSETS) {
      assertEquals(
          hashFunction.hashString(string, charset),
          hashFunction.newHasher().putString(string, charset).hash());
    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,

        hashFunction.newHasher().putUnencodedChars(string).hash());
    for (Charset charset : CHARSETS) {
      assertEquals(
          hashFunction.hashString(string, charset),
          hashFunction.newHasher().putString(string, charset).hash());
    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,

  for (i in 0 until length) {
    val c = this[i]
    if (c <= '\u001f' || c >= '\u007f') {
      return i
    }
  }
  return -1
}

/** Returns true if we should void putting this this header in an exception or toString(). */
internal fun isSensitiveHeader(name: String): Boolean =
  name.equals("Authorization", ignoreCase = true) ||
    name.equals("Cookie", ignoreCase = true) ||

    @SuppressWarnings("SynchronizeOnNonFinalField")
    public T get() {
      // Another variant of Double Checked Locking.
      //
      // We use two volatile reads. We could reduce this to one by
      // putting our fields into a holder class, but (at least on x86)
      // the extra memory consumption and indirection are more
      // expensive than the extra volatile reads.
      long nanos = expirationNanos;

    EntryComparator(@Nullable Comparator<? super K> keyComparator) {
      this.keyComparator = keyComparator;
    }

    @Override
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // no less safe than putting it in the map!
    public int compare(Entry<K, V> a, Entry<K, V> b) {
      return (keyComparator == null)
          ? ((Comparable) a.getKey()).compareTo(b.getKey())
          : keyComparator.compare(a.getKey(), b.getKey());

    EntryComparator(@Nullable Comparator<? super K> keyComparator) {
      this.keyComparator = keyComparator;
    }

    @Override
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // no less safe than putting it in the map!
    public int compare(Entry<K, V> a, Entry<K, V> b) {
      return (keyComparator == null)
          ? ((Comparable) a.getKey()).compareTo(b.getKey())
          : keyComparator.compare(a.getKey(), b.getKey());