func TestScanToEmbedded(t *testing.T) {
	person1 := Person{Name: "person 1"}
	person2 := Person{Name: "person 2"}
	DB.Save(&person1).Save(&person2)

	address1 := Address{Name: "address 1"}
	address2 := Address{Name: "address 2"}
	DB.Save(&address1).Save(&address2)

	DB.Create(&PersonAddress{PersonID: person1.ID, AddressID: int(address1.ID)})
	DB.Create(&PersonAddress{PersonID: person1.ID, AddressID: int(address2.ID)})

				{"ID", "Person", "PersonID", "likes", "", true},
				{"ID", "Thing", "ThingID", "likes", "", false},
			},
		},
		Relation{
			Name: "Dislikes", Type: schema.Many2Many, Schema: "Person", FieldSchema: "Thing",
			JoinTable: JoinTable{Name: "dislikes", Table: "dislikes"},
			References: []Reference{
				{"ID", "Person", "PersonID", "dislikes", "", true},
				{"ID", "Thing", "ThingID", "dislikes", "", false},
			},
		},
	)

    public void setFrom(String from, String personal) {
        doSetFrom(from, personal);
    }

    public void addTo(String to) {
        doAddTo(to);
    }

    public void addTo(String to, String personal) {
        doAddTo(to, personal);
    }

    public void addCc(String cc) {
        doAddCc(cc);
    }

    public void addCc(String cc, String personal) {
        doAddCc(cc, personal);
    }

### Das Problem reproduzieren

In den meisten Fällen und bei den meisten Fragen ist etwas mit dem von der Person erstellten **eigenen Quellcode** los.

In vielen Fällen wird nur ein Fragment des Codes gepostet, aber das reicht nicht aus, um **das Problem zu reproduzieren**.

////

### Klassen als Typen

Sie können auch eine Klasse als Typ einer Variablen deklarieren.

Nehmen wir an, Sie haben eine Klasse `Person`, mit einem Namen:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py hl[1:3] *}

Dann können Sie eine Variable vom Typ `Person` deklarieren:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py hl[6] *}

Und wiederum bekommen Sie die volle Editor-Unterstützung:

называются **Generic-типами** или **Generics**.

### Классы как типы

Вы также можете объявить класс как тип переменной.

Допустим, у вас есть класс `Person` с полем `name`:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py hl[1:3] *}


Тогда вы можете объявить переменную типа `Person`:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py hl[6] *}


И снова вы получаете полную поддержку редактора:

////

### Classes as types { #classes-as-types }

You can also declare a class as the type of a variable.

Let's say you have a class `Person`, with a name:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py hl[1:3] *}

Then you can declare a variable to be of type `Person`:

{* ../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial010.py hl[6] *}

And then, again, you get all the editor support:

Le serveur va dans la cuisine 👨‍🍳.

Vous attendez devant le comptoir afin que personne ne prenne vos burgers 🍔 avant vous, vu qu'il n'y a pas de numéro de commande.

<img src="/img/async/parallel-burgers/parallel-burgers-03.png" class="illustration">

  }

  /**
   * Explicitly specifies the return type of this {@code Invokable}. For example:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * Method factoryMethod = Person.class.getMethod("create");
   * Invokable<?, Person> factory = Invokable.of(getNameMethod).returning(Person.class);
   * }
   */
  public final <R1 extends R> Invokable<T, R1> returning(Class<R1> returnType) {
    return returning(TypeToken.of(returnType));
  }

* If you can't understand the question, ask for more **details**.

### Reproduce the problem { #reproduce-the-problem }

For most of the cases and most of the questions there's something related to the person's **original code**.

In many cases they will only copy a fragment of the code, but that's not enough to **reproduce the problem**.