C filtered = filter(createUnfiltered(contents), EVEN);
          try {
            assertEquals(expectedResult, filtered.add(toAdd));
            assertTrue(EVEN.apply(toAdd));
          } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
            assertFalse(EVEN.apply(toAdd));
          }
        }
      }
    }

    public void testRemove() {

     * Even if empty string, treated as empty plainly. So "IF pmb != null" is false if empty.
     * @param hostname The parameter value of hostname. (NotNull)
     */
    public void setHostname(String hostname) {
        registerVariable("hostname", hostname);
    }

    /**
     * Set the value of jobname, used in parameter comment. <br>

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

    // forward map ordered by currency (even for country values)
    assertThat(bimap.values()).containsExactly(Country.SWITZERLAND, Country.CHILE).inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().keySet())
        .containsExactly(Country.CHILE, Country.SWITZERLAND)
        .inOrder();
    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)

            0.03,
            BloomFilterStrategies.MURMUR128_MITZ_32);

    // Insert "numInsertions" even numbers into the BF.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {
      bf.put(Integer.toString(i));
    }
    assertApproximateElementCountGuess(bf, numInsertions);

    // Assert that the BF "might" have all of the even numbers.
    for (int i = 0; i < numInsertions * 2; i += 2) {

      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.

### `response_model` Priority

If you declare both a return type and a `response_model`, the `response_model` will take priority and be used by FastAPI.

This way you can add correct type annotations to your functions even when you are returning a type different than the response model, to be used by the editor and tools like mypy. And still you can have FastAPI do the data validation, documentation, etc. using the `response_model`.

   * ClassLoader that loaded that class from later being garbage-collected. If anything continues
   * to reference the FinalizableReferenceQueue class then its ClassLoader cannot be
   * garbage-collected, even if there are no more instances of FinalizableReferenceQueue itself.
   * The code in FinalizableReferenceQueue goes to considerable trouble to ensure that there are

      return;
    }

    /*
     * Any of the setException() calls below can fail if the output Future is cancelled between now
     * and then. This means that we're silently swallowing an exception -- maybe even an Error. But
     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *

## Version 4.11.0

_2023-04-22_

 *  Fix: Don't fail the call when the response code is ‘HTTP 102 Processing’ or
    ‘HTTP 103 Early Hints’.
 *  Fix: Read the response even if writing the request fails. This means you'll get a proper HTTP
    response even if the server rejects your request body.
 *  Fix: Use literal IP addresses directly rather than passing them to `DnsOverHttps`.