assertEquals(hashFunction.hashBytes(bytes), hashFunction.hashBytes(ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes)));
  }

  static void assertHashByteBufferExhaustsBuffer(HashFunction hashFunction) {
    Random rng = new Random(0L);
    byte[] bytes = new byte[rng.nextInt(256) + 1];
    rng.nextBytes(bytes);
    ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes);
    HashCode unused = hashFunction.hashBytes(buffer);

    assertEquals(hashFunction.hashBytes(bytes), hashFunction.hashBytes(ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes)));
  }

  static void assertHashByteBufferExhaustsBuffer(HashFunction hashFunction) {
    Random rng = new Random(0L);
    byte[] bytes = new byte[rng.nextInt(256) + 1];
    rng.nextBytes(bytes);
    ByteBuffer buffer = ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes);
    HashCode unused = hashFunction.hashBytes(buffer);

    Mac mac = Mac.getInstance(algorithm);
    mac.init(key);
    mac.update(input);

    assertEquals(HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal()), hashFunc.hashBytes(input));
    assertEquals(HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal(input)), hashFunc.hashBytes(input));
  }

  // Tests from RFC2022: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case1() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(20, 0x0b);

    Mac mac = Mac.getInstance(algorithm);
    mac.init(key);
    mac.update(input);

    assertEquals(HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal()), hashFunc.hashBytes(input));
    assertEquals(HashCode.fromBytes(mac.doFinal(input)), hashFunc.hashBytes(input));
  }

  // Tests from RFC2022: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2202

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case1() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(20, 0x0b);

   *     {@code len < 0}
   */
  HashCode hashBytes(byte[] input, int off, int len);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putBytes(input).hash()}. The implementation <i>might</i>
   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 23.0
   */
  HashCode hashBytes(ByteBuffer input);

  /**

   *     {@code len < 0}
   */
  HashCode hashBytes(byte[] input, int off, int len);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putBytes(input).hash()}. The implementation <i>might</i>
   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 23.0
   */
  HashCode hashBytes(ByteBuffer input);

  /**

			if target.client.isAtleastV7() {
				hh, _ := highwayhash.New(magicHighwayHash256Key) // New will never return error since key is 256 bit
				hh.Write([]byte(key))
				hashBytes := hh.Sum(nil)
				keyHash = base64.URLEncoding.EncodeToString(hashBytes)
			} else {
				keyHash = key
			}
		}

		if eventData.EventName == event.ObjectRemovedDelete {
			err = target.client.removeEntry(ctx, target.args.Index, keyHash)

      output.write(bytes, offset, length);
      return length;
    }

    @Override
    public HashCode hash(HashFunction hashFunction) throws IOException {
      return hashFunction.hashBytes(bytes, offset, length);
    }

    @Override
    public ByteSource slice(long offset, long length) {
      checkArgument(offset >= 0, "offset (%s) may not be negative", offset);