if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy info minio2 rw
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin user info minio1 "uid=dillon,ou=people,ou=swengg,dc=min,dc=io"
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "policy mapping missing, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy info minio1 rw
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy info minio2 rw
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy info minio3 rw
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin user info minio1 foobar
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then

        Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor(new ThreadFactoryImpl());
    // Add a listener to shut down the executor after the service is stopped. This ensures that the
    // JVM shutdown will not be prevented from exiting after this service has stopped or failed.
    // Technically this listener is added after start() was called so it is a little gross, but it

        Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor(new ThreadFactoryImpl());
    // Add a listener to shut down the executor after the service is stopped. This ensures that the
    // JVM shutdown will not be prevented from exiting after this service has stopped or failed.
    // Technically this listener is added after start() was called so it is a little gross, but it

            op.setup(form -> {
                form.initialize();
                form.crudMode = CrudMode.CREATE;
            });
        });
    }

    /**
     * Displays the form for editing an existing related content item.
     *
     * @param form the edit form containing the ID of the item to edit
     * @return HTML response for the edit form
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })

                form.crudMode = CrudMode.CREATE;
            });
        }).renderWith(data -> {
            registerWebConfigItems(data);
        });
    }

    /**
     * Displays the form for editing an existing request header item.
     *
     * @param form the edit form containing the ID of the item to edit
     * @return HTML response for the edit form
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })

                form.crudMode = CrudMode.CREATE;
            });
        }).renderWith(data -> {
            registerLabels(data);
        });
    }

    /**
     * Shows the form for editing an existing elevate word.
     *
     * @param form edit form containing the elevate word ID
     * @return HTML response for the edit elevate word form
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })

            op.setup(form -> {
                form.initialize();
                form.crudMode = CrudMode.CREATE;
            });
        });
    }

    /**
     * Displays the form for editing an existing scheduled job.
     *
     * @param form the edit form containing the ID of the job to edit
     * @return HTML response for the job edit form
     */
    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE })

    public void test_update() throws Exception {
        writeTestFile("a,b => c\nd,e => f\n");

        // Get existing item
        OptionalEntity<CharMappingItem> existing = charMappingFile.get(1L);
        assertTrue(existing.isPresent());

        // Update the item
        CharMappingItem updateItem = existing.get();
        updateItem.setNewInputs(new String[] { "m", "n" });
        updateItem.setNewOutput("o");

In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.