typedef void (*MemoryReleaser)(void* data, size_t len, void* arg);

  // Create a tensor instance from the given data buffer and description.
  // `memory_releaser` will be called on destruction, and it's responsible for
  // cleaning up the underlying buffer.
  virtual AbstractTensorInterface* CreateTensor(
      DataType dtype, const int64_t* dims, int num_dims, void* data, size_t len,

namespace tensorflow {

namespace {

// Managing context for the DLManagedTensor, will manage the lifetime of
// DLManagedTensor. When calling DLManagedTensor::deleter, it will notify the
// original framework of destruction, and this context will be deleted also.
struct TfDlManagedTensorCtx {
  TensorReference reference;
  std::vector<int64_t> shape;
  std::vector<int64_t> strides;
  DLManagedTensor tensor;

	go f()
}
</pre>

<p>
calling <code>hello</code> will print <code>"hello, world"</code>
at some point in the future (perhaps after <code>hello</code> has returned).
</p>

<h3 id="goexit">Goroutine destruction</h3>

<p>
The exit of a goroutine is not guaranteed to be synchronized before
any event in the program.
For example, in this program:
</p>

<pre>
var a string

func hello() {

        List<Restriction> restrictions = range.getRestrictions();
        assertEquals(1, restrictions.size(), CHECK_NUM_RESTRICTIONS);
        Restriction restriction = restrictions.get(0);
        assertNull(restriction.getLowerBound(), CHECK_LOWER_BOUND);
        assertFalse(restriction.isLowerBoundInclusive(), CHECK_LOWER_BOUND_INCLUSIVE);
        assertEquals("1.0", restriction.getUpperBound().toString(), CHECK_UPPER_BOUND);

    }

    private List<Restriction> intersection(List<Restriction> r1, List<Restriction> r2) {
        List<Restriction> restrictions = new ArrayList<>(r1.size() + r2.size());
        Iterator<Restriction> i1 = r1.iterator();
        Iterator<Restriction> i2 = r2.iterator();
        Restriction res1 = i1.next();
        Restriction res2 = i2.next();

        boolean done = false;

Instead, the compiler operates on a kind of semi-abstract instruction set,
and instruction selection occurs partly after code generation.
The assembler works on the semi-abstract form, so
when you see an instruction like <code>MOV</code>
what the toolchain actually generates for that operation might
not be a move instruction at all, perhaps a clear or load.
Or it might correspond exactly to the machine instruction with that name.

		}
		p.errorf("wrong number of arguments to %s instruction", op)
		return
	case 4:
		if p.arch.Family == sys.S390X || p.arch.Family == sys.PPC64 {
			// 4-operand compare-and-branch.
			prog.From = a[0]
			prog.Reg = p.getRegister(prog, op, &a[1])
			prog.AddRestSource(a[2])
			target = &a[3]
			break
		}
		p.errorf("wrong number of arguments to %s instruction", op)
		return
	default:

const (
	RFP = -(iota + 1)
	RSB
	RSP
	RPC
)

// Arch wraps the link architecture object with more architecture-specific information.
type Arch struct {
	*obj.LinkArch
	// Map of instruction names to enumeration.
	Instructions map[string]obj.As
	// Map of register names to enumeration.
	Register map[string]int16
	// Table of register prefix names. These are things like R for R(0) and SPR for SPR(268).

        "The specified user does not exist.", "The specified network password is not correct.", "Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.",
        "Logon failure: user account restriction.", "Logon failure: account logon time restriction violation.",
        "Logon failure: user not allowed to log on to this computer.", "Logon failure: the specified account password has expired.",

	pendingLabels []string // Labels to attach to next instruction.
	labels        map[string]*obj.Prog
	toPatch       []Patch
	addr          []obj.Addr
	arch          *arch.Arch
	ctxt          *obj.Link
	firstProg     *obj.Prog
	lastProg      *obj.Prog
	dataAddr      map[string]int64 // Most recent address for DATA for this symbol.
	isJump        bool             // Instruction being assembled is a jump.