return opVal, opErr
	}

	// Need to evaluate the ConditionRHS
	switch {
	case e.ConditionRHS.Compare != nil:
		cmpRight, cmpRErr := e.ConditionRHS.Compare.Operand.evalNode(r, tableAlias)
		if cmpRErr != nil {
			return nil, cmpRErr
		}

		b, err := opVal.compareOp(strings.ToUpper(e.ConditionRHS.Compare.Operator), cmpRight)
		return FromBool(b), err

	case e.ConditionRHS.Between != nil:

	case opEq:
		if len(left) != len(right) {
			return false, nil
		}
		for i, l := range left {
			eq, err := l.compareOp(op, &right[i])
			if !eq || err != nil {
				return eq, err
			}
		}
		return true, nil
	case opIneq:
		for i, l := range left {
			eq, err := l.compareOp(op, &right[i])
			if eq || err != nil {
				return eq, err
			}
		}
		return false, nil
	default:

	bothNumeric := v1.isNumeric() && v2.isNumeric()
	if atleastOneNumeric || !bothNumeric {
		return v1, nil
	}

	if v1.SameTypeAs(*v2) {
		return v1, nil
	}

	cmpResult, cmpErr := v1.compareOp(opEq, v2)
	if cmpErr != nil {
		return nil, cmpErr
	}

	if cmpResult {
		return FromNull(), nil
	}

	return v1, nil
}

func charlen(v *Value) (*Value, error) {

 * compare} methods unconditionally, the {@code ComparisonChain} implementation stops calling its
 * inputs' {@link Comparable#compareTo compareTo} and {@link Comparator#compare compare} methods as
 * soon as one of them returns a nonzero result. This optimization is typically important only in
 * the presence of expensive {@code compareTo} and {@code compare} implementations.
 *

            ComparableVersion c = new ComparableVersion(version);

            if (prev != null) {
                int compare = prev.compareTo(c);
                System.out.println(
                        "   " + prev + ' ' + ((compare == 0) ? "==" : ((compare < 0) ? "<" : ">")) + ' ' + version);
            }

            System.out.println(

        assertTrue(lesser + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', lesser.compareTo(t) < 0);
        assertFalse(lesser.equals(t));
      }

      assertEquals(t + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', 0, t.compareTo(t));
      assertTrue(t.equals(t));

      for (int j = i + 1; j < valuesInExpectedOrder.size(); j++) {
        T greater = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j);
        assertTrue(greater + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', greater.compareTo(t) > 0);

        assertTrue(lesser + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', lesser.compareTo(t) < 0);
        assertFalse(lesser.equals(t));
      }

      assertEquals(t + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', 0, t.compareTo(t));
      assertTrue(t.equals(t));

      for (int j = i + 1; j < valuesInExpectedOrder.size(); j++) {
        T greater = valuesInExpectedOrder.get(j);
        assertTrue(greater + ".compareTo(" + t + ')', greater.compareTo(t) > 0);

   * instead (but note that it does not guarantee which tied minimum element is returned).
   *
   * @param a value to compare, returned if less than or equal to the rest.
   * @param b value to compare
   * @param c value to compare
   * @param rest values to compare
   * @throws ClassCastException if the parameters are not <i>mutually comparable</i> under this
   *     ordering.
   */
  @ParametricNullness

  /**
   * A specification for which index to return if the list contains at least one element that
   * compares as equal to the key.
   */
  enum KeyPresentBehavior {
    /**
     * Return the index of any list element that compares as equal to the key. No guarantees are
     * made as to which index is returned, if more than one element compares as equal to the key.
     */
    ANY_PRESENT {
      @Override

  /**
   * A specification for which index to return if the list contains at least one element that
   * compares as equal to the key.
   */
  enum KeyPresentBehavior {
    /**
     * Return the index of any list element that compares as equal to the key. No guarantees are
     * made as to which index is returned, if more than one element compares as equal to the key.
     */
    ANY_PRESENT {
      @Override