cacheStore                *sync.Map
}

func (schema *Schema) String() string {
	if schema.ModelType.Name() == "" {
		return fmt.Sprintf("%s(%s)", schema.Name, schema.Table)
	}
	return fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", schema.ModelType.PkgPath(), schema.ModelType.Name())
}

func (schema *Schema) MakeSlice() reflect.Value {
	slice := reflect.MakeSlice(reflect.SliceOf(reflect.PointerTo(schema.ModelType)), 0, 20)
	results := reflect.New(slice.Type())

///

### Поле `examples` у JSON Schema

Пізніше JSON Schema додала поле <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a> у нову версію специфікації.

І вже OpenAPI 3.1.0 базується на цій новій версії (JSON Schema 2020-12), яка включає поле `examples`.

///

### Поле `examples` в JSON Schema { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Позже в новой версии спецификации JSON Schema было добавлено поле <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a>.

А затем новый OpenAPI 3.1.0 был основан на последней версии (JSON Schema 2020-12), которая включала это новое поле `examples`.

///

### Campo `examples` do JSON Schema { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Depois, o JSON Schema adicionou um campo <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a> em uma nova versão da especificação.

E então o novo OpenAPI 3.1.0 passou a se basear na versão mais recente (JSON Schema 2020-12), que incluiu esse novo campo `examples`.

///

### Campo `examples` de JSON Schema { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Pero luego JSON Schema añadió un <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">campo `examples`</a> a una nueva versión de la especificación.

Y entonces el nuevo OpenAPI 3.1.0 se basó en la última versión (JSON Schema 2020-12) que incluía este nuevo campo `examples`.

///

### JSON Schemas Feld `examples` { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Aber dann fügte JSON Schema ein <a href="https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5" class="external-link" target="_blank">`examples`</a>-Feld zu einer neuen Version der Spezifikation hinzu.

Und dann basierte das neue OpenAPI 3.1.0 auf der neuesten Version (JSON Schema 2020-12), die dieses neue Feld `examples` enthielt.

`"json_schema_extra"`를 생성된 JSON 스키마에서 보여주고 싶은 별도의 데이터와 `examples`를 포함하는 `dict`으로 설정할 수 있습니다.

////

//// tab | Pydantic v1

Pydantic v1에서 <a href="https://docs.pydantic.dev/1.10/usage/schema/#schema-customization" class="external-link" target="_blank">Pydantic 공식 문서: Schema customization</a>에서 설명하는 것처럼, 내부 클래스인 `Config`와 `schema_extra`를 사용할 것입니다.

`schema_extra`를 생성된 JSON 스키마에서 보여주고 싶은 별도의 데이터와 `examples`를 포함하는 `dict`으로 설정할 수 있습니다.

////

/// tip | 팁

    url: AnyUrl


# Ref JSON Schema 2020-12: https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-validation#name-type
SchemaType = Literal[
    "array", "boolean", "integer", "null", "number", "object", "string"
]


class Schema(BaseModelWithConfig):
    # Ref: JSON Schema 2020-12: https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-core.html#name-the-json-schema-core-vocabu
    # Core Vocabulary

                        },
                        "422": {
                            "description": "Validation Error",
                            "content": {
                                "application/json": {
                                    "schema": {
                                        "$ref": "#/components/schemas/HTTPValidationError"

			relation.Type = HasMany
		}
	}

	if schema.err == nil {
		schema.setRelation(relation)
		switch relation.Type {
		case HasOne:
			schema.Relationships.HasOne = append(schema.Relationships.HasOne, relation)
		case HasMany:
			schema.Relationships.HasMany = append(schema.Relationships.HasMany, relation)
		case BelongsTo:
			schema.Relationships.BelongsTo = append(schema.Relationships.BelongsTo, relation)
		case Many2Many: