}

    /**
     * Test basic initialization with session ID
     */
    public void test_init_withSessionId() {
        String sessionId = "test-session-001";
        urlFilter.init(sessionId);
        // Initialization should complete without errors
        assertNotNull(urlFilter);
    }

    /**
     * Test initialization with null session ID
     */

        // First initialization
        if (client.isInit.compareAndSet(false, true)) {
            client.init();
        }
        assertTrue("Client should be initialized", client.isInit.get());

        // Second initialization attempt should be no-op
        boolean secondInit = client.isInit.compareAndSet(false, true);
        assertFalse("Second initialization should not occur", secondInit);

     *
     * This method implements lazy initialization with synchronization to ensure
     * the authenticator is only created once. It configures the authenticator
     * with the appropriate SPNEGO settings and marks initialization as complete.
     *
     * @return The configured SPNEGO authenticator instance
     * @throws SsoLoginException if SPNEGO initialization fails
     */

		namer:            namer,
		initialized:      make(chan struct{}),
	}
	// When the schema initialization is completed, the channel will be closed
	defer close(schema.initialized)

	// Load exist schema cache, return if exists
	if v, ok := cacheStore.Load(schemaCacheKey); ok {
		s := v.(*Schema)
		// Wait for the initialization of other goroutines to complete
		<-s.initialized
		return s, s.err
	}

   * time for AbstractFutureState to potentially use them during class initialization.
   * (AbstractFutureState class initialization can log, and that logging could in theory call into
   * AbstractFuture, which wouldn't yet have had the chance to perform any class initialization of
   * its own.)
   */

  /** A special value to represent {@code null}. */

   * time for AbstractFutureState to potentially use them during class initialization.
   * (AbstractFutureState class initialization can log, and that logging could in theory call into
   * AbstractFuture, which wouldn't yet have had the chance to perform any class initialization of
   * its own.)
   */

  /** A special value to represent {@code null}. */

     * Each thread handles crawling for a single data configuration,
     * processing documents and updating the search index.
     *
     * <p>The thread manages:</p>
     * <ul>
     *   <li>Data store initialization and document processing</li>
     *   <li>Index update operations through callbacks</li>
     *   <li>Error handling and failure logging</li>
     *   <li>Cleanup of old documents after successful crawling</li>

    }

    @Test
    public void testInitNormal() throws IOException {
        // Test normal initialization
        converter.init();
        assertTrue(testConverter.isInitialized());
    }

    @Test
    public void testInitMultipleTimes() throws IOException {
        // Test multiple initialization calls
        converter.init();
        assertTrue(testConverter.isInitialized());

        // Call init again

        when(mockConfig.getNotifyBufferSize()).thenReturn(4096);
        when(mockConfig.getTransactionBufferSize()).thenReturn(65535);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test constructor initialization with basic parameters")
    void testConstructorBasic() {
        int fid = 0x1234;
        int completionFilter = FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_FILE_NAME;
        boolean watchTree = false;

            // Test with concrete implementation
            String concreteDomain = concreteImplementation.getDomain();
            // Should be DOMAIN based on our initialization
            assertEquals("DOMAIN", concreteDomain);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should get link")
        void testGetLink() {
            String link = "\\\\server\\share\\link";