assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {

We don't really need to inherit from `HeroBase` because we are re-declaring all the fields. I'll leave it inheriting just for consistency, but this is not necessary. It's more a matter of personal taste. 🤷

The fields of `HeroUpdate` are:

* `name`
* `age`
* `secret_name`

{* ../../docs_src/sql_databases/tutorial002_an_py310.py ln[7:28] hl[25:28] *}

### Modern Java 21 Support
- **Pattern Matching** - Leverages modern Java pattern matching for efficient type checking and conversion
- **Switch Expressions** - Optimized implementations using switch expressions for better performance
- **Sequenced Collections** - Full support for Java 21 sequenced collections API with dedicated utility methods
- **Performance Focused** - Optimized implementations for better runtime performance with reduced memory allocation

   * Each bit is set to 1 for all remainders that indicate divisibility by 2, 3, or 5, so
   * 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 are set to 0. 30 and up don't matter because they won't be hit.
   */
  private static final int SIEVE_30 =
      ~((1 << 1) | (1 << 7) | (1 << 11) | (1 << 13) | (1 << 17) | (1 << 19) | (1 << 23)
          | (1 << 29));

  /**

* Then check if the question (the vast majority are questions) is **clear**.

* In many cases the question asked is about an imaginary solution from the user, but there might be a **better** one. If you can understand the problem and use case better, you might be able to suggest a better **alternative solution**.

* If you can't understand the question, ask for more **details**.

### Reproduce the problem { #reproduce-the-problem }

    // Behold the weirdness!
    assertFalse(domain.publicSuffix().isPublicSuffix());
  }

  public void testPublicSuffixMultipleUnders() {
    // PSL has both *.uk and *.sch.uk; the latter should win.
    // See https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1176

    InternetDomainName domain = InternetDomainName.from("www.essex.sch.uk");
    assertTrue(domain.hasPublicSuffix());

   * under the assumption that for long-running instances, observed
   * contention levels will recur, so the cells will eventually be
   * needed again; and for short-lived ones, it does not matter.
   */

  /**
   * Padded variant of AtomicLong supporting only raw accesses plus CAS. The value field is placed
   * between pads, hoping that the JVM doesn't reorder them.
   *

    return stringWriter.toString();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the stack trace of {@code throwable}, possibly providing slower iteration over the full
   * trace but faster iteration over parts of the trace. Here, "slower" and "faster" are defined in
   * comparison to the normal way to access the stack trace, {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()

### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

            <sourceFileExclude>**/ForceGuavaCompilation*</sourceFileExclude>
          </sourceFileExcludes>
          <!-- The above exclusion doesn't actually matter unless I prevent Javadoc from autodiscovering the source in the sourcepath, which defaults to the source directory :\ Boo for -sourcepath. -->
          <sourcepath>doesnotexist</sourcepath>