// +optional
  optional bool attachRequired = 1;

  // podInfoOnMount indicates this CSI volume driver requires additional pod information (like podName, podUID, etc.)
  // during mount operations, if set to true.
  // If set to false, pod information will not be passed on mount.
  // Default is false.
  //
  // The CSI driver specifies podInfoOnMount as part of driver deployment.

      return state.policy.backoffDelayMillis.jitterBy(state.policy.backoffJitterMillis) * 1_000_000
    }
  }

  private fun Long.jitterBy(amount: Int): Long {
    return this + ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(amount * -1, amount)
  }

  class AddressState(
    val address: Address,
    val queue: TaskQueue,
    var policy: ConnectionPool.AddressPolicy,
  ) {
    /**

  // +optional
  optional bool attachRequired = 1;

  // podInfoOnMount indicates this CSI volume driver requires additional pod information (like podName, podUID, etc.)
  // during mount operations, if set to true.
  // If set to false, pod information will not be passed on mount.
  // Default is false.
  //
  // The CSI driver specifies podInfoOnMount as part of driver deployment.

And multiple processes normally **don't share any memory**. This means that each running process has its own things, variables, and memory. And if you are consuming a large amount of memory in your code, **each process** will consume an equivalent amount of memory.

### Server Memory

  }

  private fun updateMaxConcurrentStreams(
    connection: Http2Connection,
    amount: Int,
  ) {
    val settings = Settings()
    settings[Settings.MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS] = amount
    connection.readerRunnable.applyAndAckSettings(true, settings)
    assertThat(connection.peerSettings[Settings.MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS]).isEqualTo(amount)
    taskFaker.runTasks()
  }

you will have a more or less well-defined, stable, and limited amount of memory consumed by each of those containers (more than one if they are replicated).

And then you can set those same memory limits and requirements in your configurations for your container management system (for example in **Kubernetes**). That way it will be able to **replicate the containers** in the **available machines** taking into account the amount of memory needed by them, and the amount available in the machines...

As of Go 1.23 (`winsymlink=1`), mount points no longer have [`os.ModeSymlink`](/pkg/os#ModeSymlink)
set, and reparse points that are not symlinks, Unix sockets, or dedup files now
always have [`os.ModeIrregular`](/pkg/os#ModeIrregular) set. As a result of these changes,
[`filepath.EvalSymlinks`](/pkg/path/filepath#EvalSymlinks) no longer evaluates
mount points, which was a source of many inconsistencies and bugs.

   * unspecified amount of padding; you almost certainly mean to call {@link
   * #newArrayListWithCapacity} (see that method for further advice on usage).
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> This method will soon be deprecated. Even in the rare case that you do want
   * some amount of padding, it's best if you choose your desired amount explicitly.
   *

It would take the same amount of time to finish with or without turns (concurrency) and you would have done the same amount of work.

//     token: "Bearer xxxxx" # optional authentication token for the notification endpoint

//   retry:
//     attempts: 10 # number of retries for the job before giving up
//     delay: "500ms" # least amount of delay between each retry

//go:generate msgp -file $GOFILE -unexported

// BatchKeyRotationType defines key rotation type
type BatchKeyRotationType string

const (
	sses3  BatchKeyRotationType = "sse-s3"