* of the child. The general idea is to adjust inherited URLs to match the project layout (in SCM).
     *
     * <p>This calculation is only a heuristic based on our conventions.
     * In detail, the algo relies on the following assumptions: <ul>
     * <li>The parent uses aggregation and refers to the child via the modules section</li>
     * <li>The module path to the child is considered to

                        }

                        if (resolved == null) {
                            // TODO add better exception that can detail the two conflicting artifacts
                            ArtifactResolutionException are = new ArtifactResolutionException(
                                    "Cannot resolve artifact version conflict between "

     * we consider that it's signature will not be changed by the SUBSTITUTION_OVERRIDE, so the wrapper can be unwrapped.
     *
     * This have a few caveats when it comes to the inner classes. TODO Provide a reference to some more in-detail description of that.
     *
     * @receiver A declaration that needs to be unwrapped.
     * @return An unsubstituted declaration ([originalForSubstitutionOverride]]) if it exists and if it does not have any change

when it starts in an interactive mode:

    Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author
    Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type
    `show w'. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute
    it under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.

The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the
appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands

                        getLogger().debug(metadata + " could not be found on repository: " + repository.getId());

                        // delete the local copy so the old details aren't used.
                        if (file.exists()) {
                            if (!file.delete()) {
                                // sleep for 10ms just in case this is windows holding a file lock

        // have been resolved.
        if (request.isResolveRoot()) {
            // Add the root artifact (as the first artifact to retain logical order of class path!)
            Set<Artifact> allArtifacts = new LinkedHashSet<>();
            allArtifacts.add(rootArtifact);
            allArtifacts.addAll(result.getArtifacts());

                                + ", transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available"
                                + ", enable verbose output (-X) for more details";
                    }

                    if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                        message += ": " + e.getMessage();
                    }

                    logger.warn(message);

                        // This merge is on purpose because otherwise user properties would override model
                        // properties in dependencies the user does not know. See MNG-7563 for details.
                        .systemProperties(toProperties(session.getUserProperties(), session.getSystemProperties()))
                        .userProperties(Map.of())
                        .modelResolver(modelResolver)

    }

    @Override
    public boolean isResolved() {
        return resolved;
    }

    @Override
    public void setResolvedVersion(String version) {
        this.version = version;
        // retain baseVersion
    }

    @Override
    public void setArtifactHandler(ArtifactHandler artifactHandler) {
        this.artifactHandler = artifactHandler;
    }

    @Override

        VersionRange range2 = VersionRange.createFromVersionSpec("1.1");
        VersionRange mergedRange = range1.restrict(range2);
        // TODO current policy is to retain the original version - is this correct, do we need strategies or is that
        // handled elsewhere?
        //        assertEquals( "1.1", mergedRange.getRecommendedVersion().toString(), CHECK_VERSION_RECOMMENDATION );