f := getFields(line)
		if len(f) < 6 {
			continue
		}
		port, _, portOk := dtoi(f[4])
		priority, _, priorityOk := dtoi(f[3])
		weight, _, weightOk := dtoi(f[2])
		if !(portOk && priorityOk && weightOk) {
			continue
		}
		addrs = append(addrs, &SRV{absDomainName(f[5]), uint16(port), uint16(priority), uint16(weight)})
		cname = absDomainName(f[0])
	}
	byPriorityWeight(addrs).sort()
	return
}

		return
	}

	// We intentionally set the UID of the flow-schema and priority-level instead of name. This is so that
	// the names that cluster-admins choose for categorization and priority levels are not exposed, also
	// the names might make it obvious to the users that they are rejected due to classification with low priority.

	// 1. calculate the LocalityLbEndpoints.Priority compared with proxy locality
	for i, localityEndpoint := range loadAssignment.Endpoints {
		// if region/zone/subZone all match, the priority is 0.
		// if region/zone match, the priority is 1.
		// if region matches, the priority is 2.
		// if locality not match, the priority is 3.
		priority := util.LbPriority(locality, localityEndpoint.Locality)

				kube_pod_resource_request{namespace="test",node="",pod="foo-unscheduled-succeeded",priority="",resource="cpu",scheduler="",unit="cores"} 1
				kube_pod_resource_request{namespace="test",node="node-one",pod="foo-pending",priority="",resource="cpu",scheduler="",unit="cores"} 1
				kube_pod_resource_request{namespace="test",node="node-one",pod="foo-unknown",priority="",resource="cpu",scheduler="",unit="cores"} 1
				`,
		},
		{

this level. This is the number of execution seats nominally reserved for this priority level. This DOES NOT limit the dispatching from this priority level but affects the other priority levels through the borrowing mechanism. The server's concurrency limit (ServerCL) is divided among all the priority levels in proportion to their NCS values:\n\nNominalCL(i)  = ceil( ServerCL * NCS(i) / sum_ncs ) sum_ncs = sum[priority level k] NCS(k)\n\nBigger numbers mean a larger nominal concurrency limit, at the...

		SuggestedFlowSchemaSystemNodeHigh,            // references "node-high" priority-level
		SuggestedFlowSchemaProbes,                    // references "exempt" priority-level
		SuggestedFlowSchemaSystemLeaderElection,      // references "leader-election" priority-level
		SuggestedFlowSchemaWorkloadLeaderElection,    // references "leader-election" priority-level

	// `"Limited"` means that (a) requests of this priority level
	// _are_ subject to limits and (b) some of the server's limited
	// capacity is made available exclusively to this priority level.
	// Required.
	// +unionDiscriminator
	Type PriorityLevelEnablement `json:"type" protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=type"`

	// `limited` specifies how requests are handled for a Limited priority level.

this level. This is the number of execution seats nominally reserved for this priority level. This DOES NOT limit the dispatching from this priority level but affects the other priority levels through the borrowing mechanism. The server's concurrency limit (ServerCL) is divided among all the priority levels in proportion to their NCS values:\n\nNominalCL(i)  = ceil( ServerCL * NCS(i) / sum_ncs ) sum_ncs = sum[priority level k] NCS(k)\n\nBigger numbers mean a larger nominal concurrency limit, at the...

    public ToolchainConfiguration getToolchainConfiguration() {
        return toolchainConfiguration;
    }

    public Priority getPriority() {
        return priority;
    }

    public void setPriority(Priority priority) {
        this.priority = priority;
    }

    public enum Priority {
        LOW,
        NORMAL,
    }

					}
					if cluster.LoadAssignment.Endpoints[i].Priority != tt.expected[i].Priority {
						t.Errorf("Got unexpected priority %v expected %v", cluster.LoadAssignment.Endpoints[i].Priority, tt.expected[i].Priority)
					}
				}
			})
		}
	})

	t.Run("FailoverPriority with Failover", func(t *testing.T) {
		tests := []struct {