try {
        stimuli[i].executeAndCompare(reference, target);
        verify(reference.getElements());
      } catch (AssertionError cause) {
        throw new AssertionError("failed with stimuli " + subListCopy(stimuli, i + 1), cause);
      }
    }
  }

  private static List<Object> subListCopy(Object[] source, int size) {
    final Object[] copy = new Object[size];

        new AbstractFuture<Object>() {
          @Override
          public String pendingToString() {
            return "cause=[Because this test isn't done]";
          }
        };
    assertThat(testFuture.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, info=\\[cause=\\[Because this test isn't done\\]\\]\\]");
    TimeoutException e =

     * called.
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public Builder<C> addAll(RangeSet<C> ranges) {
      return addAll(ranges.asRanges());
    }

    /**
     * Add all of the specified ranges to this builder. Adjacent ranges are permitted and will be
     * merged, but overlapping ranges will cause an exception when {@link #build()} is called.

          }
        };
    AssertionError actual = null;
    try {
      tester.test();
    } catch (AssertionError e) {
      actual = e;
    }
    assertNotNull("verify() should be able to cause test failure", actual);
    assertTrue(
        "AssertionError should have info about why test failed",
        actual.getCause().getMessage().contains(message));
  }

  public void testMissingException() {

/**
 * Base class for JSR166 Junit TCK tests. Defines some constants, utility methods and classes, as
 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>

        verifyBarPass(method, bar); // All args nullable:  anything goes!
      }
    }
  }

  /*
   * This next part consists of several sample classes that provide
   * demonstrations of conditions that cause NullPointerTester
   * to succeed/fail.
   */

  /** Lots of well-behaved methods. */
  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // used by reflection
  private static class PassObject extends SomeClassThatDoesNotUseNullable {

   * Executor#execute execute}, as in {@code ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy}.
   *
   * <p>This executor is appropriate for tasks that are lightweight and not deeply chained.
   * Inappropriate {@code directExecutor} usage can cause problems, and these problems can be
   * difficult to reproduce because they depend on timing. For example:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>When a {@code ListenableFuture} listener is registered to run under {@code

      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Associates the ({@code rowKey}, {@code columnKey}) pair with {@code value} in the built
     * table. Duplicate key pairs are not allowed and will cause {@link #build} to fail.
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public Builder<R, C, V> put(R rowKey, C columnKey, V value) {
      cells.add(cellOf(rowKey, columnKey, value));
      return this;
    }

     * not allowed, and will cause {@link #build} to fail.
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    @Override
    public Builder<K, V> put(K key, V value) {
      super.put(key, value);
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Adds the given {@code entry} to the bimap. Duplicate keys or values are not allowed, and will
     * cause {@link #build} to fail.
     *
     * @since 19.0

   * Executor#execute execute}, as in {@code ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy}.
   *
   * <p>This executor is appropriate for tasks that are lightweight and not deeply chained.
   * Inappropriate {@code directExecutor} usage can cause problems, and these problems can be
   * difficult to reproduce because they depend on timing. For example:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>When a {@code ListenableFuture} listener is registered to run under {@code