defer n.lockMapMutex.Unlock()
	if _, found := n.lockMap[resource]; !found {
		return
	}
	if readLock {
		n.lockMap[resource].RUnlock()
	} else {
		n.lockMap[resource].Unlock()
	}
	n.lockMap[resource].ref--
	if n.lockMap[resource].ref < 0 {
		logger.CriticalIf(GlobalContext, errors.New("resource reference count was lower than 0"))
	}
	if n.lockMap[resource].ref == 0 {

	var locksHeld int64
	if locksHeld, reply = l.lockMap[args.Resources[0]]; !reply {
		l.lockMap[args.Resources[0]] = ReadLock // No locks held on the given name, so claim (first) read lock
		reply = true
	} else if reply = locksHeld != WriteLock; reply { // Unless there is a write lock
		l.lockMap[args.Resources[0]] = locksHeld + ReadLock // Grant another read lock
	}
	return reply, nil
}

		Writer:          true,
		UID:             "89ab-cdef",
		Timestamp:       UTCNow().UnixNano(),
		TimeLastRefresh: UTCNow().UnixNano(),
	}

	locker.ll.lockMap["name"] = []lockRequesterInfo{
		lockRequesterInfo1,
		lockRequesterInfo2,
	}

	lri := locker.ll.lockMap["name"]

	// test unknown uid
	if locker.ll.removeEntry("name", dsync.LockArgs{
		Owner: "owner",
		UID:   "unknown-uid",
	}, &lri) {

		//    successfully acquiring the lock.
		// 2) lk2 then needs to advance and remove the resource from lockMap.
		// 3) lk3 or lk4 (whichever didn't execute in step 1) then executes and creates
		//    a new entry in lockMap and acquires a lock for the same resource.

		<-lk2ch
		lk3ok := <-lk3ch
		lk4ok := <-lk4ch

		if lk3ok && lk4ok {