@Test
  public void equivalent_selfLoop_directedVsUndirected() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ.
  @Test

  @Test
  public void equivalent_selfLoop_directedVsUndirected() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.addEdge(N1, N1, E11);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ.
  @Test

    attributes:
      label: Has this idea, or one like it, been proposed before?
      description: If so, how does this proposal differ?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1. Mention the related proposals 
        2. then describe how this proposal differs       
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: error-handling-proposal
    attributes:

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_directedVsUndirected() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.putEdge(N1, N2);

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but directedness differs.
  @Test

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_directedVsUndirected() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.putEdge(N1, N2);

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets and node/edge connections are the same, but directedness differs.
  @Test

			fmt.Printf("unreadable on source - size differs upon read: %s\n", srcCtnt.Key)
			sourceFailed = true
		}
	}()
	go func() {
		defer wg.Done()
		tgtSize, err := io.Copy(tgtSha256, tobj)
		if err != nil {
			fmt.Printf("unreadable on target: %s (%s)\n", tgtCtnt.Key, err)
			targetFailed = true
		} else if tgtSize != tgtCtnt.Size {
			fmt.Printf("unreadable on target - size differs upon read: %s\n", tgtCtnt.Key)

expanded_policy_count=$(./mc admin policy list myminio/ | wc -l)

if [ $user_count -ne $expanded_user_count ]; then
	echo "BUG: original user count differs from expanded setup"
	exit 1
fi

if [ $policy_count -ne $expanded_policy_count ]; then
	echo "BUG: original policy count  differs from expanded setup"
	exit 1
fi

./mc version info myminio/versioned | grep -q "versioning is enabled"
ret=$?
if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then

expanded_policy_count=$(./mc admin policy list myminio/ | wc -l)

if [ $user_count -ne $expanded_user_count ]; then
	echo "BUG: original user count differs from expanded setup"
	exit 1
fi

if [ $policy_count -ne $expanded_policy_count ]; then
	echo "BUG: original policy count  differs from expanded setup"
	exit 1
fi

./mc version info myminio/versioned | grep -q "versioning is enabled"
ret=$?
if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then

Valid values: 

```
curve25519-sha256
******@****.***
ecdh-sha2-nistp256
ecdh-sha2-nistp384
ecdh-sha2-nistp521
diffie-hellman-group14-sha256
diffie-hellman-group16-sha512
diffie-hellman-group14-sha1
diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
```

`--sftp=cipher-algos=...` specifies the allowed cipher algorithms. 
If unspecified then a sensible default is used.

Valid values: 

  // +optional
  optional string subResource = 4;

  // RequestKind is the fully-qualified type of the original API request (for example, v1.Pod or autoscaling.v1.Scale).
  // If this is specified and differs from the value in "kind", an equivalent match and conversion was performed.
  //
  // For example, if deployments can be modified via apps/v1 and apps/v1beta1, and a webhook registered a rule of