* insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

 * that support Java 1.4 and before. Our library needs to do the bare minimum to accommodate such
 * types, though their use may still require an explicit type parameter and/or warning suppression.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@SuppressWarnings({"ComparableType", "rawtypes"}) // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

 * that support Java 1.4 and before. Our library needs to do the bare minimum to accommodate such
 * types, though their use may still require an explicit type parameter and/or warning suppression.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@SuppressWarnings({"ComparableType", "rawtypes"}) // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

      }
    }
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return elements.length;
  }

  // We're careful to put only E instances into the array in the mainline.
  // (In the backport, we don't need this suppression, but we keep it to minimize diffs.)
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  @Override
  public UnmodifiableIterator<E> iterator() {
    return (UnmodifiableIterator<E>) Iterators.forArray(elements);
  }

  @Override

 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which
 *       look for any annotation named, e.g., "GwtIncompatible," regardless of package.