*/
  private void assertSuppressed(Suppression... expected) {
    assertEquals(ImmutableList.copyOf(expected), suppressor.suppressions);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): Just use addSuppressed+getSuppressed now that we can rely on it.
  /** Suppressor that records suppressions. */
  private static class TestSuppressor implements Closer.Suppressor {

    private final List<Suppression> suppressions = new ArrayList<>();

    @Override

   */
  private void assertSuppressed(Suppression... expected) {
    assertEquals(ImmutableList.copyOf(expected), suppressor.suppressions);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): Just use addSuppressed+getSuppressed now that we can rely on it.
  /** Suppressor that records suppressions. */
  private static class TestSuppressor implements Closer.Suppressor {

    private final List<Suppression> suppressions = new ArrayList<>();

    @Override

        // Test protected constructor with suppression enabled
        String message = "Test with suppression";
        TestFessSystemException exception = new TestFessSystemException(message, true, true);

        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());
        assertNull(exception.getCause());

        // Test that suppression is enabled

    @Test
    public void test_suppressionAndStackTrace() {
        // Test that suppression and stack trace are disabled (as per constructor)
        String parentUrl = "http://example.com/parent";
        String url = "http://example.com/child";
        ContentNotFoundException exception = new ContentNotFoundException(parentUrl, url);

        // Verify that suppression is disabled
        try {

        super(cause);
    }

    /**
     * Constructs a new FessSystemException with the specified detail message and suppression settings.
     *
     * @param message the detail message describing the exception
     * @param enableSuppression whether suppression is enabled or disabled
     * @param writableStackTrace whether the stack trace should be writable
     */

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the
   * suppression externally, but it's OK because we don't enforce test-size rules there.)
   *

   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either
   * add the suppression to the whole method (which turns off checking for a large section of code),
   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,