Guillaume Nodet <******@****.***> 1729859506 +0200

- Is small, focused, and easy to review—ideally one commit, unless multiple commits better narrate complex work.
- Adheres to MinIO’s coding standards (e.g., Go style, error handling, testing).

PRs must flow smoothly through review to reach production. Large PRs should be split into smaller, manageable ones.

## Submitting PRs

It is quite an extensive specification and covers several complex use cases.

It includes ways to authenticate using a "third party".

That's what all the systems with "login with Facebook, Google, X (Twitter), GitHub" use underneath.

### OAuth 1 { #oauth-1 }

There was an OAuth 1, which is very different from OAuth2, and more complex, as it included direct specifications on how to encrypt the communication.

Disallow: /*.pdf$
Disallow: /admin/*.php
Disallow: /*/private/
Allow: /public/*.html

# Test end-of-path ($) patterns
User-agent: EndPathBot
Disallow: /fish$
Disallow: /temp$
Allow: /fishing

# Test complex patterns
User-agent: ComplexBot
Disallow: /
Allow: /$
Allow: /index.html$
Allow: /public/

# Test priority rules (longer match wins)
User-agent: PriorityBot
Disallow: /store
Allow: /store/public

    /**
     * This test primarily exists to ensure the constants interface can be loaded
     * and to provide a basic check of its values.
     * Since it's an interface with only static final fields, there is no complex logic to test.
     */
    @Test
    void testConstants() {
        // A simple assertion to verify that some of the constants have the expected values.

5. The daemon sends the result back. For some requests, this might be a simple success/failure result, and for others this might also include a more complex object, such as a tooling API model.

        // The fact that the object is successfully created implies the super constructor was called.
    }

    // Additional tests could be added here if MsrpcSamrOpenAlias had more methods or complex logic.
    // For this specific class, the constructor is the main point of logic.

 * task cannot be implemented with {@link ListeningExecutorService}, the various {@link Futures}
 * utility methods, or {@link ListenableFutureTask}. Those APIs have less opportunity for developer
 * error. If your needs are more complex than {@code SettableFuture} supports, use {@link
 * AbstractFuture}, which offers an extensible version of the API.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 9.0 (in 1.0 as {@code ValueFuture})
 */
@GwtCompatible

 * task cannot be implemented with {@link ListeningExecutorService}, the various {@link Futures}
 * utility methods, or {@link ListenableFutureTask}. Those APIs have less opportunity for developer
 * error. If your needs are more complex than {@code SettableFuture} supports, use {@link
 * AbstractFuture}, which offers an extensible version of the API.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 9.0 (in 1.0 as {@code ValueFuture})
 */
@GwtCompatible

- **Flexibility and Control:**
Java serialization offers limited control over the serialization process, such as excluding certain fields, customizing naming conventions, and handling complex data structures more gracefully.

- **Security:**
Java serialization poses security risks, especially related to deserialization vulnerabilities.

- **Version Compatibility:**