*
     * The semantic is equivalent to
     * ```
     * annotationsList.hasAnnotation(classId) == annotationsList.annotations.any { it.classId == classId }
     * ```
     * @param classId [ClassId] to search
     */
    public operator fun contains(classId: ClassId): Boolean

    @Deprecated("Use 'contains' instead.", replaceWith = ReplaceWith("contains(classId)"))

    // Handle unresolved annotation calls gracefully
    @OptIn(UnresolvedExpressionTypeAccess::class)
    val annotationClass = annotation.coneTypeOrNull?.toClassSymbol(session)?.fir ?: return null

    // The search is done via scope to force Java enhancement. Annotation class might be a 'FirJavaClass'
    return annotationClass

config.test_exec_root = os.environ['RUNFILES_DIR']

if platform.system() == 'Windows':
  tool_patterns = [
      ToolSubst('FileCheck.exe', unresolved='fatal'),
      #  Handle these specially as they are strings searched for during testing.
      ToolSubst('count.exe', unresolved='fatal'),
      ToolSubst('not.exe', unresolved='fatal')
  ]

  llvm_config.config.substitutions.append(
      ('%python', '"%s"' % (sys.executable)))