protected static final int SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA = 3;
  private static final String RESULT_DATA = "SUCCESS";

  private SettableFuture<String> outputFuture;
  // Signals that the function is waiting to complete
  private CountDownLatch funcIsWaitingLatch;
  // Signals the function so it will complete
  private CountDownLatch funcCompletionLatch;

  @Override

   * Creates a TimeLimiter instance using the given executor service to execute method calls.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> using a bounded executor may be counterproductive! If the thread pool fills
   * up, any time callers spend waiting for a thread may count toward their time limit, and in this
   * case the call may even time out before the target method is ever invoked.
   *

  protected static final int SLOW_FUNC_VALID_INPUT_DATA = 3;
  private static final String RESULT_DATA = "SUCCESS";

  private SettableFuture<String> outputFuture;
  // Signals that the function is waiting to complete
  private CountDownLatch funcIsWaitingLatch;
  // Signals the function so it will complete
  private CountDownLatch funcCompletionLatch;

  @Override

        assertThrows(
            TimeoutException.class,
            () -> service.startAsync().awaitRunning(1, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS));
    assertThat(e)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("Timed out waiting for Foo [STARTING] to reach the RUNNING state.");
  }

  private static class TestService extends AbstractIdleService {
    int startUpCalled = 0;
    int shutDownCalled = 0;

   * protect ourselves from that we want to make sure that tasks don't spin too much waiting for the
   * interrupting thread to complete the protocol.
   */
  /*
   * This test hangs (or maybe is just *very* slow) under Android.
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Ideally, get this to pass under Android. Failing that, convince ourselves

    latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
    future = createListenableFuture(Boolean.TRUE, null, latch);
  }

  @Override
  protected void tearDown() throws Exception {

    // Make sure we have no waiting threads.
    latch.countDown();
  }

  /** Constructs a listenable future with a value available after the latch has counted down. */
  protected abstract <V> ListenableFuture<V> createListenableFuture(

   * protect ourselves from that we want to make sure that tasks don't spin too much waiting for the
   * interrupting thread to complete the protocol.
   */
  /*
   * This test hangs (or maybe is just *very* slow) under Android.
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Ideally, get this to pass under Android. Failing that, convince ourselves

    latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
    future = createListenableFuture(Boolean.TRUE, null, latch);
  }

  @Override
  protected void tearDown() throws Exception {

    // Make sure we have no waiting threads.
    latch.countDown();
  }

  /** Constructs a listenable future with a value available after the latch has counted down. */
  protected abstract <V> ListenableFuture<V> createListenableFuture(

        assertThrows(
            TimeoutException.class,
            () -> service.startAsync().awaitRunning(1, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS));
    assertThat(e)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("Timed out waiting for Foo [STARTING] to reach the RUNNING state.");
  }

  private static class TestService extends AbstractIdleService {
    int startUpCalled = 0;
    int shutDownCalled = 0;

    private final Executor adapterExecutor;

    // The execution list to hold our listeners.
    private final ExecutionList executionList = new ExecutionList();

    // This allows us to only start up a thread waiting on the delegate future when the first
    // listener is added.
    private final AtomicBoolean hasListeners = new AtomicBoolean(false);

    // The delegate future.
    private final Future<V> delegate;