testers.add(ListToArrayTester.class);
    return testers;
  }

  /**
   * Specifies {@link CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER} for all list tests, since lists have an
   * iteration ordering corresponding to the insertion order.
   */
  @Override
  public TestSuite createTestSuite() {
    withFeatures(KNOWN_ORDER);
    return super.createTestSuite();
  }

  @Override
  protected List<TestSuite> createDerivedSuites(

        }
      };
    }

    /** Uses an insertion-ordered hash-based {@code Set} to store value collections. */
    public SetMultimapBuilder<K0, @Nullable Object> linkedHashSetValues() {
      return linkedHashSetValues(DEFAULT_EXPECTED_VALUES_PER_KEY);
    }

    /**
     * Uses an insertion-ordered hash-based {@code Set} to store value collections, initialized to

import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
import java.util.Arrays;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * {@code ObjectCountLinkedHashMap} is a subclass of {@code ObjectCountHashMap} with insertion
 * iteration order, and uses arrays to store key objects and count values. Comparing to using a
 * traditional {@code LinkedHashMap} implementation which stores keys and count values as map

   * specified access policy.
   *
   * @param capacity the capacity of this queue
   * @param fair if {@code true} then queue accesses for threads blocked on insertion or removal,
   *     are processed in FIFO order; if {@code false} the access order is unspecified.
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code capacity} is less than 1
   */

    checkNotNull(columnFunction, "columnFunction");
    checkNotNull(valueFunction, "valueFunction");
    checkNotNull(mergeFunction, "mergeFunction");

    /*
     * No mutable Table exactly matches the insertion order behavior of ImmutableTable.Builder, but
     * the Builder can't efficiently support merging of duplicate values.  Getting around this
     * requires some work.
     */

    return Collector.of(

   */
  public long approximateElementCount() {
    long bitSize = bits.bitSize();
    long bitCount = bits.bitCount();

    /**
     * Each insertion is expected to reduce the # of clear bits by a factor of
     * `numHashFunctions/bitSize`. So, after n insertions, expected bitCount is `bitSize * (1 - (1 -
     * numHashFunctions/bitSize)^n)`. Solving that for n, and approximating `ln x` as `x - 1` when x

  }

  /**
   * Populates the graph with nodes and edges in a star shape with node `1` in the middle.
   *
   * <p>Note that the edges are added in a shuffled order to properly test the effect of the
   * insertion order.
   */
  private void populateTShapedGraph() {
    putEdge(2, 1);
    putEdge(1, 4);
    putEdge(1, 3);
    putEdge(1, 2); // Duplicate
    putEdge(4, 5);
  }

  // Element Mutation

import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * CompactLinkedHashMap is an implementation of a Map with insertion or LRU iteration order,
 * maintained with a doubly linked list through the entries. All optional operations (put and
 * remove) are supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *

  }

  /**
   * Populates the graph with nodes and edges in a star shape with node `1` in the middle.
   *
   * <p>Note that the edges are added in a shuffled order to properly test the effect of the
   * insertion order.
   */
  private void populateStarShapedGraph() {
    putEdge(2, 1);
    putEdge(1, 4);
    putEdge(1, 3);
    putEdge(5, 1);
    putEdge(1, 2);
    putEdge(3, 1);
  }

  }

  /**
   * Populates the graph with nodes and edges in a star shape with node `1` in the middle.
   *
   * <p>Note that the edges are added in a shuffled order to properly test the effect of the
   * insertion order.
   */
  private void populateStarShapedGraph() {
    putEdge(2, 1);
    putEdge(1, 4);
    putEdge(1, 3);
    putEdge(5, 1);
    putEdge(1, 2);
    putEdge(3, 1);
  }