// Exclude classes that were moved in a different package but the deprecated ones are not removed yet
        excludedPackages.add("org.gradle.platform.base.test");
        return excludedPackages;
    }

    // TODO: This doesn't really make sense to be part of the user manual generation, but it's so tied up into it
    // it's left here for a future project.

## Return the same input data

Here we are declaring a `UserIn` model, it will contain a plaintext password:

=== "Python 3.10+"

    ```Python hl_lines="7  9"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py!}
    ```

BMP, GIF, WAV, RAW, RAW\_PADDED, CSV and PROTO formats. All other input formats,
including tensorflow-io should be sandboxed if used to process untrusted data.

For example, if an attacker were to upload a malicious video file, they could
potentially exploit a vulnerability in the TensorFlow code that handles videos,
which could allow them to execute arbitrary code on the system running
TensorFlow.

have to make sure that it's a single process running those previous steps *even* if afterwards, you start **multiple processes** (multiple workers) for the application itself. If those steps were run by **multiple processes**, they would **duplicate** the work by running it on **parallel**, and if the steps were something delicate like a database migration, they could cause conflicts with each other.

Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous steps multiple...

versions of FastAPI before 0.99.0 (0.99.0 and above use the newer OpenAPI 3.1.0) when you used `example` or `examples` with any of the other utilities (`Query()`, `Body()`, etc.) those examples were not added to the JSON Schema that describes that data (not even to OpenAPI's own version of JSON Schema), they were added directly to the *path operation* declaration in OpenAPI (outside the parts of OpenAPI that use JSON Schema).

But now that FastAPI 0.99.0 and above uses OpenAPI 3.1.0, that uses...

    //    were added to the queue. It's easily possible for one thread to take the head of the
    //    queue, immediately followed by another thread taking the next element in the queue. That
    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher

   * between pads, hoping that the JVM doesn't reorder them.
   *
   * <p>JVM intrinsics note: It would be possible to use a release-only form of CAS here, if it were
   * provided.
   */
  static final class Cell {
    volatile long p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6;
    volatile long value;
    volatile long q0, q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6;

    Cell(long x) {

Here we will see how to work with **SQLAlchemy ORM**.

In a similar way you could use any other ORM.

!!! tip
    There's an equivalent article using Peewee here in the docs.

## File structure

   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.
     * 2. The client thread is interrupted sometime before the result would be
     *   available.

   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.
     * 2. The client thread is interrupted sometime before the result would be
     *   available.