{{/*
Complex logic ahead...
We have three sets of values, in order of precedence (last wins):
1. The builtin values.yaml defaults
2. The profile the user selects
3. Users input (-f or --set)

Unfortunately, Helm provides us (1) and (3) together (as .Values), making it hard to insert (2).

However, we can workaround this by placing all of (1) under a specific key (.Values.defaults).

          if (rule.startsWith(EXCEPTION_RULE_MARKER)) {
            rule = rule.substring(1)
            // We use '\n' for end of value.
            totalExceptionRuleBytes += rule.size + 1
            sortedExceptionRules.add(rule)
          } else {
            totalRuleBytes += rule.size + 1 // We use '\n' for end of value.
            sortedRules.add(rule)
          }
        }
      }

	buf, err := xattr.LGet(s.formatFile, attr)
	if err != nil {
		// We start off with '0' if we can read the attributes
		return 0
	}
	return binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(buf[:8])
}

func (s *xlStorage) getWriteAttribute() uint64 {
	attr := "user.total_writes"
	buf, err := xattr.LGet(s.formatFile, attr)
	if err != nil {
		// We start off with '0' if we can read the attributes
		return 0
	}

		// There is at least one SSE-S3 single-part object.
		// For all SSE-S3 single-part objects we have to
		// fetch their decryption keys. We do this using
		// a Bulk-Decryption API call, if available.
		keys, err := crypto.S3.UnsealObjectKeys(ctx, k, metadata, buckets, names)
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}

		// Now, we have to decrypt the ETags of SSE-S3 single-part

        /*
         * We don't *need* to use reflection to access Optional: It's available on all JDKs we
         * support, and Android code won't get this far, anyway, because ProcessHandle is
         * unavailable. But given how much other reflection we're using, we might as well use it
         * here, too, so that we don't need to also suppress an AndroidApiChecker error.
         */

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *

        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the
        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address

Complex logic ahead...
We have three sets of values, in order of precedence (last wins):
1. The builtin values.yaml defaults
2. The profile the user selects
3. Users input (-f or --set)

Unfortunately, Helm provides us (1) and (3) together (as .Values), making it hard to insert (2).

However, we can workaround this by placing all of (1) under a specific key (.Values.defaults).

Complex logic ahead...
We have three sets of values, in order of precedence (last wins):
1. The builtin values.yaml defaults
2. The profile the user selects
3. Users input (-f or --set)

Unfortunately, Helm provides us (1) and (3) together (as .Values), making it hard to insert (2).

However, we can workaround this by placing all of (1) under a specific key (.Values.defaults).

           * well be a JDK bug.
           */
          || info.getName().contains("TypeTokenTest")
      /*
       * Luckily, we don't care about analyzing tests at all. We'd skip them all if we could do so
       * trivially, but it's enough to skip these ones.
       */
      ) {
        continue;
      }
      Class<?> clazz = info.load();
      try {