// This input was created by taking the instruction productions in
// the old assembler's (8a's) grammar and hand-writing complete
// instructions for each rule, to guarantee we cover the same space.

#include "../../../../../runtime/textflag.h"

TEXT foo(SB), DUPOK|NOSPLIT, $0

// LTYPE1 nonrem	{ outcode(int($1), &$2); }
	SETCC	AX
	SETCC	foo+4(SB)

// LTYPE2 rimnon	{ outcode(int($1), &$2); }
	DIVB	AX
	DIVB	foo+4(SB)
	PUSHL	$foo+4(SB)

    validations:
      required: true
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: |
        Please make sure that this is a bug. As per our [GitHub Policy](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/ISSUES.md), we only address code/doc bugs, performance issues, feature requests and build/installation issues on GitHub.

  - type: dropdown
    id: tf-nightly
    attributes:
      label: Have you reproduced the bug with TensorFlow Nightly?

# Adapted from istio-discovery/templates/mutatingwebhook.yaml
# Removed paths for legacy and default selectors since a revision tag
# is inherently created from a specific revision
{{/* Copy just what we need to avoid expensive deepCopy */}}
{{- $whv := dict
 "revision" .Values.revision
  "injectionURL" .Values.istiodRemote.injectionURL
  "namespace" .Release.Namespace }}
{{- define "core" }}
- name: {{.Prefix}}sidecar-injector.istio.io
  clientConfig:

      {{- end }}
      {{- else }}
      discoveryAddress: istiod{{- if not (eq .Values.revision "") }}-{{ .Values.revision }}{{- end }}.{{.Release.Namespace}}.svc:15012
      {{- end }}
{{- end }}

{{/* We take the mesh config above, defined with individual values.yaml, and merge with .Values.meshConfig */}}
{{/* The intent here is that meshConfig.foo becomes the API, rather than re-inventing the API in values.yaml */}}

        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the
        real-world use case so the community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually

      {{- end }}
      {{- else }}
      discoveryAddress: istiod{{- if not (eq .Values.revision "") }}-{{ .Values.revision }}{{- end }}.{{.Release.Namespace}}.svc:15012
      {{- end }}
{{- end }}

{{/* We take the mesh config above, defined with individual values.yaml, and merge with .Values.meshConfig */}}
{{/* The intent here is that meshConfig.foo becomes the API, rather than re-inventing the API in values.yaml */}}

Complex logic ahead...
We have three sets of values, in order of precedence (last wins):
1. The builtin values.yaml defaults
2. The profile the user selects
3. Users input (-f or --set)

Unfortunately, Helm provides us (1) and (3) together (as .Values), making it hard to insert (2).

However, we can workaround this by placing all of (1) under a specific key (.Values.defaults).

Complex logic ahead...
We have three sets of values, in order of precedence (last wins):
1. The builtin values.yaml defaults
2. The profile the user selects
3. Users input (-f or --set)

Unfortunately, Helm provides us (1) and (3) together (as .Values), making it hard to insert (2).

However, we can workaround this by placing all of (1) under a specific key (.Values.defaults).

proper Docker Image Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }}...

proper Docker Image Registry Secret Names */}} {{- define "minio.imagePullSecrets" -}} {{/* Helm 2.11 supports the assignment of a value to a variable defined in a different scope, but Helm 2.9 and 2.10 does not support it, so we need to implement this if-else logic. Also, we can not use a single if because lazy evaluation is not an option */}} {{- if .Values.global }} {{- if .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} imagePullSecrets: {{- range .Values.global.imagePullSecrets }} - name: {{ . }} {{- end }}...