}

        MetadataGraphNode node = new MetadataGraphNode(md);
        addNode(node);
        return node;
    }

    /**
     * getter
     */
    public MetadataGraphNode getEntry() {
        return entry;
    }

    /**
     * getter
     */
    public Collection<MetadataGraphNode> getNodes() {
        return nodes;
    }

=== Dead Section Links
This section doesn't exist: <<missing_section>>
Also see this one, which is another dead link: <<other_missing_section>>
        """

        when:
        run('checkDeadInternalLinks').buildAndFail()

        then:
        assertFoundDeadSectionLinks(sampleDoc, "missing_section", "other_missing_section")
    }

    def "validates present section links"() {
        given:
        sampleDoc << """

		<div class="row">
			<div class="col">

				<jsp:include page="${helpPage}" />

			</div>
		</div>
		<div class="text-right">
			<a href="#"><la:message key="labels.footer_back_to_top" /></a>
		</div>
	</main>
	<jsp:include page="footer.jsp" />
	<input type="hidden" id="contextPath" value="${contextPath}" />
	<script type="text/javascript"
		src="${fe:url('/js/jquery-3.6.3.min.js')}"></script>

                                    </tr>
                                    </tbody>
                                </table>
                            </div>
                            <div class="card-footer">
                                <button type="submit" class="btn btn-default" name="list" value="back">
                                    <em class="fa fa-arrow-circle-left">

  `Take off your hat,' the King said to the Hatter.

  `It isn't mine,' said the Hatter.

  `Stolen!' the King exclaimed, turning to the jury, who
instantly made a memorandum of the fact.

  `I keep them to sell,' the Hatter added as an explanation;
`I've none of my own.  I'm a hatter.'

  Here the Queen put on her spectacles, and began staring at the
Hatter, who turned pale and fidgeted.

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

    callbacks=callback_router3.routes,
)

router2_override.include_router(router4_override)

router2_override.include_router(router4_default)

router2_default.include_router(
    router4_override,
    prefix="/level3",
    tags=["level3a", "level3b"],
    dependencies=[Depends(dep3)],
    responses={
        403: {"description": "Client error level 3"},
        503: {"description": "Server error level 3"},

from fastapi import APIRouter, FastAPI
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient

app = FastAPI()

router = APIRouter()


@router.get("/users/{id}")
def read_user(segment: str, id: str):
    return {"segment": segment, "id": id}


app.include_router(router, prefix="/{segment}")


client = TestClient(app)


def test_get():
    response = client.get("/seg/users/foo")

)
router_b_override.include_router(router_b_a, prefix="/a")
router_a.include_router(router_a_a, prefix="/a")
router_a.include_router(
    router_a_b_override, prefix="/b", default_response_class=PlainTextResponse
)
app.include_router(router_a, prefix="/a")
app.include_router(
    router_b_override, prefix="/b", default_response_class=PlainTextResponse
)


client = TestClient(app)

		<div class="row">
			<div class="col">

				<jsp:include page="${helpPage}" />

			</div>
		</div>
		<div class="text-right">
			<a href="#"><la:message key="labels.footer_back_to_top" /></a>
		</div>
	</main>
	<jsp:include page="footer.jsp" />
	<input type="hidden" id="contextPath" value="${contextPath}" />
	<script type="text/javascript"
		src="${fe:url('/js/jquery-3.6.3.min.js')}"></script>