}

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of
     * project b.  We will pick up project c in this case because no
     * restrictions were placed on d.  This demonstrates that a, b, c, & d will
     * all be collected.
     *

 *       typically implemented by opening a stream using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the stream or channel that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @since 14.0
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class ByteSink {

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ByteSink() {}

        StringWriter buffer = new StringWriter(1024);

        PrintWriter writer = new PrintWriter(buffer);

        writer.print(problems.size());
        writer.print((problems.size() == 1) ? " problem was " : " problems were ");
        writer.print("encountered while building the effective model");
        if (modelId != null && !modelId.isEmpty()) {
            writer.print(" for ");
            writer.print(modelId);

        ProjectBuildingException exception = new ProjectBuildingException(results);
        String message = exception.getMessage();

        assertTrue(
                message.contains("1 problem was encountered while processing the POMs"),
                "Message should use singular form for single problem");

        assertTrue(
                message.contains("[WARNING] Deprecated feature used"),

# one, checks the filesize, and then ensures the new wheel is installable.
set -exo pipefail

cd "$TFCI_OUTPUT_DIR"

# Move extra wheel files somewhere out of the way. This script
# expects just one wheel file to exist.
if [[ "$(ls *.whl | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" != "1" ]]; then
  echo "More than one wheel file is present: moving the oldest to"
  echo "$TFCI_OUTPUT_DIR/extra_wheels."

     */
    public String queries;

    /**
     * User who created the related query entry.
     */
    public String createdBy;

    /**
     * Timestamp when the related query was created.
     */
    public String createdTime;

    /**
     * Version number for optimistic locking.
     */
    public String versionNo;

    /**
     * Default constructor for RelatedQueryPager.

In short, it will take the same time to compare `stanleyjobsox` to `stanleyjobson` than it takes to compare `johndoe` to `stanleyjobson`. And the same for the password.

That way, using `secrets.compare_digest()` in your application code, it will be safe against this whole range of security attacks.

### Return the error { #return-the-error }

		return args, err
	}

	getCfg := func(cfgParam string) string {
		// As parameters are already validated, we skip checking
		// if the config param was found.
		val, _, _ := s.ResolveConfigParam(config.PolicyPluginSubSys, config.Default, cfgParam, false)
		return val
	}

	pluginURL := getCfg(URL)
	if pluginURL == "" {
		return args, nil
	}

        for (int i = 0; i < l; ++i) {
            Object arg = args[i];
            // if we are careful down below, a null argument goes in there
            // so we can know that the null was passed to the method
            classes[i] = arg == null ? null : arg.getClass();
        }

        return getMostSpecific(methodList, classes);
    }

    /**

    assertTrue("Expected another permutation, but there was none.", permutations.hasNext());
    assertEquals(expectedPermutation, permutations.next());
  }

  private <T> void assertNoMorePermutations(Iterator<List<T>> permutations) {
    assertFalse("Expected no more permutations, but there was one.", permutations.hasNext());
    try {
      permutations.next();