// Assert whether the connection pool of tx is successfully converted to the *gorm.PreparedStmtDB type.
	AssertEqual(t, ok, true)
	// Assert whether the number of statement keys stored in the PreparedStmtDB is 0 after 40 seconds.
	// If it is not 0, it means the statements in the cache have not expired as expected.
	AssertEqual(t, len(conn.Stmts.Keys()), 0)

}

func TestPreparedStmtDeadlock(t *testing.T) {

	ContentRange       = "Content-Range"
	Connection         = "Connection"
	AcceptRanges       = "Accept-Ranges"
	AmzBucketRegion    = "X-Amz-Bucket-Region"
	ServerInfo         = "Server"
	RetryAfter         = "Retry-After"
	Location           = "Location"
	CacheControl       = "Cache-Control"
	ContentDisposition = "Content-Disposition"
	Authorization      = "Authorization"
	Action             = "Action"
	Range              = "Range"
)

		if _, _, err := reader.ReadRune(); err != nil {
			// should not happen
			t.Fatal(err)
		}
		tt.f(reader)
		err := reader.UnreadRune()
		if err == nil {
			t.Errorf("Unreading after %s: expected error", tt.name)
		}
	}
}

func TestReaderDoubleUnreadRune(t *testing.T) {
	buf := NewBuffer([]byte("groucho"))
	if _, _, err := buf.ReadRune(); err != nil {
		// should not happen

     * - All (unsynchronized) read operations must first read the "count" field, and should not
     * look at table entries if it is 0.
     *
     * - All (synchronized) write operations should write to the "count" field after structurally
     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily
     * cause a concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the

        int customElementIndex = xmlOutput.indexOf("<customElement>");

        // Custom element should be appended at the end
        assertTrue(customElementIndex > versionIndex, "customElement should come after version");
        assertTrue(
                xmlOutput.contains("<customElement>custom value</customElement>"),
                "Should contain custom element with content");
    }

    @Test

// existing file, such as a binary executable.
// It must be called before any data is written.
func (w *Writer) SetOffset(n int64) {
	if w.cw.count != 0 {
		panic("zip: SetOffset called after data was written")
	}
	w.cw.count = n
}

// Flush flushes any buffered data to the underlying writer.
// Calling Flush is not normally necessary; calling Close is sufficient.
func (w *Writer) Flush() error {

protobuf/etcd3 switch, and any changes since the backup will be lost.  As 1.5
does not support protobuf encoding, if you roll back to 1.5 after upgrading to
protobuf you will be forced to restore from backup, and you will lose any changes
since you converted to protobuf.  After conversion to protobuf, you should
validate the correct operation of your cluster thoroughly before returning it
to normal operation.

    assertEquals(I18N.length(), copied);
  }

  /**
   * Test for Guava issue 1061: https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1061
   *
   * <p>CharStreams.copy was failing to clear its CharBuffer after each read call, which effectively
   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size

   * the map directly affect the cache.
   *
   * <p>Iterators from the returned map are at least <i>weakly consistent</i>: they are safe for
   * concurrent use, but if the cache is modified (including by eviction) after the iterator is
   * created, it is undefined which of the changes (if any) will be reflected in that iterator.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning to users of Java 8+:</b> do not call any of the new <i>default methods</i> that

     *
     * - If the stack overflowed before set()/setValue() could even store the result in the output
     * Future, then a call setException() would likely also overflow.
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed after set()/setValue() stored its result, then a call to
     * setException() will be a no-op because the Future is already done.
     *
     * Both scenarios are bad: The output Future might never complete, or, if it does complete, it