```Python hl_lines="26"
{!../../docs_src/custom_request_and_route/tutorial003.py!}
```

Nesse exemplo, as *operações de rota* sob o `router` irão usar a classe `TimedRoute` personalizada, e terão um cabeçalho extra `X-Response-Time` na resposta com o tempo que levou para gerar a resposta:

```Python hl_lines="13-20"
{!../../docs_src/custom_request_and_route/tutorial003.py!}

 * either express or implied. See the License for the specific language
 * governing permissions and limitations under the License.
 */
package org.codelibs.fess.es.log.bsentity.dbmeta;

import java.time.LocalDateTime;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;

import org.codelibs.fess.es.log.exentity.FavoriteLog;
import org.dbflute.Entity;
import org.dbflute.dbmeta.AbstractDBMeta;

    // this will happen once the interrupt has been set which means that
    // 1. the runner has been woken up
    // 2. the interrupter is stuck in the call the Thread.interrupt()

    // after some period of time the runner thread should become blocked on the task because it is
    // waiting for the slow interrupting thread to complete Thread.interrupt
    awaitBlockedOnInstanceOf(runner, InterruptibleTask.Blocker.class);

   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {
    Random random = new Random();
    int warmupPermits = 10;

   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {
    Random random = new Random();
    int warmupPermits = 10;

replication. For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing...

Ele foi escolhido sobre outras alternativas anteriores por se adequar melhor em muitos casos.

Muitos desenvolvedores e times já dependem do **FastAPI** para seus projetos (incluindo eu e meu time).

Mas ainda há muitas melhorias e funcionalidades a vir.

**FastAPI** tem um grande futuro à frente.

            }

            // Sometimes people may add new subproject into `subprojects.json`
            // in this case we have no historical test running time, so we simply add these subprojects into first available bucket
            val allSubprojectsInBucketJson = buckets.flatMap { it.subprojects.map { it.name } }.toSet()

	Erasure struct {
		Version string `json:"version"` // Version of 'xl' format.
		Disk    string `json:"drive"`   // Disk field carries assigned disk uuid.
		// JBOD field carries the input disk order generated the first
		// time when fresh disks were supplied.
		JBOD []string `json:"jbod"`
	} `json:"xl"` // Erasure field holds xl format.
}

// Represents the V2 backend disk structure version
// under `.minio.sys` and actual data namespace.

		Secure: s.secure,
	})
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("Err creating user admin client: %v", err)
	}
	userAdmClient.SetCustomTransport(s.TestSuiteCommon.client.Transport)

	distantExpiration := time.Now().Add(30 * time.Minute)
	cr, err := userAdmClient.AddServiceAccount(ctx, madmin.AddServiceAccountReq{
		TargetUser: accessKey,
		AccessKey:  "svc-accesskey",
		SecretKey:  "svc-secretkey",
		Expiration: &distantExpiration,