Previously URLs with special characters like `|` and `[` would break when
    subjected to URI’s overly-strict validation.
 *  Fix: Don't re-encode `+` as `%20` in encoded URL query strings. OkHttp
    prefers `%20` when doing its own encoding, but will retain `+` when that is
    provided.
 *  Fix: Enforce that callers call `WebSocket.close()` on IO errors. Error

		t.Error(err)
	}

	lvl := Level1{
		Name: "l1",
		Level2s: []Level2{
			{Name: "l2-1"}, {Name: "l2-2"},
		},
	}
	DB.Save(&lvl)

	var called int64
	DB.Callback().Query().After("gorm:query").Register("TestPreloadManyToManyCallbacks", func(_ *gorm.DB) {
		atomic.AddInt64(&called, 1)
	})

	DB.Preload("Level2s").First(&Level1{}, "id = ?", lvl.ID)

	if called != 3 {

* Remove examples moved to docs site ([#23513](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/23513), [@erictune](https://github.com/erictune))
* Do not query the metadata server to find out if running on GCE.  Retry metadata server query for gcr if running on gce. ([#28871](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/28871), [@vishh](https://github.com/vishh))

### Est-ce que la concurrence est mieux que le parallélisme ?

Nope ! C'est ça la morale de l'histoire.

	// fmt.Printf("lastReq: %#v\n", lastReq.URL.String())

	// On form submission, the last redirect response contains the auth
	// code, which we now have in `lastReq`. Exchange it for a JWT id_token.
	q := lastReq.URL.Query()
	// fmt.Printf("lastReq.URL: %#v q: %#v\n", lastReq.URL, q)
	code := q.Get("code")
	oauth2Token, err := oauth2Config.Exchange(ctx, code)
	if err != nil {

### ¿Es la concurrencia mejor que el paralelismo?

¡No! Esa no es la moraleja de la historia.

    * - Fix a bug in DNS resolution for externalName services and PTR records that need to query from upstream nameserver.



# v1.8.11

[Documentation](https://docs.k8s.io) & [Examples](https://releases.k8s.io/release-1.8/examples)

## Downloads for v1.8.11


filename | sha256 hash

### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität?

Nein! Das ist nicht die Moral der Geschichte.

	}

	// Read escaped copy source path to check for parameters.
	cpSrcPath := r.Header.Get(xhttp.AmzCopySource)
	var vid string
	if u, err := url.Parse(cpSrcPath); err == nil {
		vid = strings.TrimSpace(u.Query().Get(xhttp.VersionID))
		// Note that url.Parse does the unescaping
		cpSrcPath = u.Path
	}

	srcBucket, srcObject := path2BucketObject(cpSrcPath)

这与 **FastAPI** 的性能水平相同。

您可以同时拥有并行性和异步性，您可以获得比大多数经过测试的 NodeJS 框架更高的性能，并且与 Go 不相上下， Go 是一种更接近于 C 的编译语言（<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">全部归功于 Starlette</a>）。

### 并发比并行好吗？

不！这不是故事的本意。

并发不同于并行。而是在需要大量等待的特定场景下效果更好。因此，在 Web 应用程序开发中，它通常比并行要好得多，但这并不意味着全部。

因此，为了平衡这一点，想象一下下面的短篇故事：