if tw.err != nil {
		return tw.err
	}

	// Trailer: two zero blocks.
	err := tw.Flush()
	for i := 0; i < 2 && err == nil; i++ {
		_, err = tw.w.Write(zeroBlock[:])
	}

	// Ensure all future actions are invalid.
	tw.err = ErrWriteAfterClose
	return err // Report IO errors
}

// regFileWriter is a fileWriter for writing data to a regular file entry.
type regFileWriter struct {

115C1..115C9  ; valid                  ;      ; NV8    # 7.0  SIDDHAM SIGN SIDDHAM..SIDDHAM END OF TEXT MARK
115CA..115D7  ; valid                  ;      ; NV8    # 8.0  SIDDHAM SECTION MARK WITH TRIDENT AND U-SHAPED ORNAMENTS..SIDDHAM SECTION MARK WITH CIRCLES AND FOUR ENCLOSURES
115D8..115DD  ; valid                                  # 8.0  SIDDHAM LETTER THREE-CIRCLE ALTERNATE I..SIDDHAM VOWEL SIGN ALTERNATE UU

pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct
pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct, Cmd LoadCmd
pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct, Len uint32
pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct, Path uint32
pkg debug/macho, type Section struct, Relocs []Reloc
pkg encoding/asn1, const TagNumericString = 18
pkg encoding/asn1, const TagNumericString ideal-int
pkg encoding/asn1, func MarshalWithParams(interface{}, string) ([]uint8, error)

### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität?

Nein! Das ist nicht die Moral der Geschichte.

这种异步机制正是 NodeJS 受到欢迎的原因（尽管 NodeJS 不是并行的），以及 Go 作为编程语言的优势所在。

这与 **FastAPI** 的性能水平相同。

您可以同时拥有并行性和异步性，您可以获得比大多数经过测试的 NodeJS 框架更高的性能，并且与 Go 不相上下， Go 是一种更接近于 C 的编译语言（<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">全部归功于 Starlette</a>）。

### 并发比并行好吗？

不！这不是故事的本意。

并发不同于并行。而是在需要大量等待的特定场景下效果更好。因此，在 Web 应用程序开发中，它通常比并行要好得多，但这并不意味着全部。

   */
  // Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
  @SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
  public static long checkedMultiply(long a, long b) {
    // Hacker's Delight, Section 2-12
    int leadingZeros =
        Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(b)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~b);
    /*

does not guarantee they will be satisfied. Both the “hard” and “soft” variants
of node affinity use the new syntax. Documentation is [here](http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/node-selection/) (see section “Alpha feature in Kubernetes v1.2: Node Affinity“). Design doc is [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.2/docs/design/nodeaffinity.md).

- Reduce critical section in watchcache to fix kube-apiserver scalability under heavy load of list requests ([#122027](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122027), [@wojtek-t](https://github.com/wojtek-t)) [SIG API Machinery]

## Dependencies

그리고 **FastAPI**를 사용함으로써 동일한 성능을 낼 수 있습니다.

또한 병렬성과 비동기성을 동시에 사용할 수 있기 때문에, 대부분의 테스트가 완료된 NodeJS 프레임워크보다 더 높은 성능을 얻고 C에 더 가까운 컴파일 언어인 Go와 동등한 성능을 얻을 수 있습니다<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(모두 Starlette 덕분입니다)</a>.

### 동시성이 병렬성보다 더 나은가?

그렇지 않습니다! 그것이 이야기의 교훈은 아닙니다.

   */
  // Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
  @SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
  public static long checkedMultiply(long a, long b) {
    // Hacker's Delight, Section 2-12
    int leadingZeros =
        Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(b)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~b);
    /*