* possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {

 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from

 * in com.google.guava:guava differs from the "frozen" copy in the listenablefuture artifact. This
 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from

    this.inputFuture = checkNotNull(inputFuture);
    this.function = checkNotNull(function);
  }

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings({
    "CatchingUnchecked", // sneaky checked exception
    "nullness", // TODO(b/147136275): Remove once our checker understands & and |.
  })
  public final void run() {
    @RetainedLocalRef ListenableFuture<? extends I> localInputFuture = inputFuture;

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {

    return !tooLow(t) && !tooHigh(t);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the intersection of the two ranges, or an empty range if their intersection is empty.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // TODO(cpovirk): Add casts as needed. Will be noisy and annoying...
  GeneralRange<T> intersect(GeneralRange<T> other) {
    checkNotNull(other);
    checkArgument(comparator.equals(other.comparator));

  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "LabelledBreakTarget", // TODO(b/345814817): Maybe fix?
    "nullness", // TODO(b/147136275): Remove once our checker understands & and |.
  })
  @ParametricNullness
  final V blockingGet(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
      throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException, ExecutionException {

  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "LabelledBreakTarget", // TODO(b/345814817): Maybe fix?
    "nullness", // TODO(b/147136275): Remove once our checker understands & and |.
  })
  @ParametricNullness
  final V blockingGet(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
      throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException, ExecutionException {

   * only contain entries which are already present in the cache.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys);

  /**