public void test_versionNumberEdgeCases() {
        TestSearchLogEvent event = new TestSearchLogEvent("id", 0L, "type");

        // Test minimum value
        event.setVersionNo(Long.MIN_VALUE);
        assertEquals(Long.valueOf(Long.MIN_VALUE), event.getVersionNo());

        // Test zero
        event.setVersionNo(0L);
        assertEquals(Long.valueOf(0L), event.getVersionNo());

        // Test maximum value

    if (safeMax < safeMin) {
      // If the safe range is empty, set the range limits to opposite extremes
      // to ensure the first test of either value will (almost certainly) fail.
      safeMax = Character.MIN_VALUE;
      safeMin = Character.MAX_VALUE;
    }
    this.safeMin = safeMin;
    this.safeMax = safeMax;
  }

  /*
   * This is overridden to improve performance. Rough benchmarking shows that this almost doubles

        // Valid inputs: each known code must map to its documented message
        assertEquals(expectedMessage, lookupMessage(code).orElse(null));
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { -1, Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE })
    @DisplayName("Unknown codes: lookup returns empty Optional")
    void lookup_returns_empty_for_unknown_codes(int unknownCode) {
        // Invalid inputs: codes not present should yield no message

        assertEquals("DFS resolution failed", ex.getMessage());
        verify(handle, times(1)).ensureDFSResolved();
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, -1, Integer.MIN_VALUE, Integer.MAX_VALUE })
    @DisplayName("hasCapability(cap): returns configured value and captures argument across edge caps")
    void hasCapability_variousCaps_returnsTrue_andCapturesArgument(int cap) throws Exception {

        0.1,
        0.5,
        1.0,
        Double.MAX_VALUE,
        GREATEST,
        Double.MIN_NORMAL,
        -Double.MIN_NORMAL,
        Double.MIN_VALUE,
        -Double.MIN_VALUE,
        Integer.MIN_VALUE,
        Integer.MAX_VALUE,
        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final double[] VALUES = Doubles.concat(NUMBERS, new double[] {NaN});

                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::lastAccess, 0L, "zero lastAccess"),
                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::lastAccess, Long.MIN_VALUE, "min lastAccess"),

                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::length, -100L, "negative length"),
                Arguments.of((LongGetter) FileEntry::length, 0L, "zero length"),

        -0f,
        0f,
        1f,
        Float.MAX_VALUE,
        GREATEST,
        Float.MIN_NORMAL,
        -Float.MIN_NORMAL,
        Float.MIN_VALUE,
        -Float.MIN_VALUE,
        Integer.MIN_VALUE,
        Integer.MAX_VALUE,
        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  private static final int[] EMPTY = {};
  private static final int[] ARRAY1 = {(int) 1};
  private static final int[] ARRAY234 = {(int) 2, (int) 3, (int) 4};

  private static final int LEAST = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.

        -0f,
        0f,
        1f,
        Float.MAX_VALUE,
        GREATEST,
        Float.MIN_NORMAL,
        -Float.MIN_NORMAL,
        Float.MIN_VALUE,
        -Float.MIN_VALUE,
        Integer.MIN_VALUE,
        Integer.MAX_VALUE,
        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

    }

    /**
     * Test FileEndOfFileInformation with various end of file values
     */
    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(longs = { 0L, 1L, -1L, Long.MAX_VALUE, Long.MIN_VALUE, 1024L, 1048576L })
    @DisplayName("Test FileEndOfFileInformation with various values")
    void testFileEndOfFileInformationWithVariousValues(long endOfFile) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {