115C1..115C9  ; valid                  ;      ; NV8    # 7.0  SIDDHAM SIGN SIDDHAM..SIDDHAM END OF TEXT MARK
115CA..115D7  ; valid                  ;      ; NV8    # 8.0  SIDDHAM SECTION MARK WITH TRIDENT AND U-SHAPED ORNAMENTS..SIDDHAM SECTION MARK WITH CIRCLES AND FOUR ENCLOSURES
115D8..115DD  ; valid                                  # 8.0  SIDDHAM LETTER THREE-CIRCLE ALTERNATE I..SIDDHAM VOWEL SIGN ALTERNATE UU

这种异步机制正是 NodeJS 受到欢迎的原因（尽管 NodeJS 不是并行的），以及 Go 作为编程语言的优势所在。

这与 **FastAPI** 的性能水平相同。

您可以同时拥有并行性和异步性，您可以获得比大多数经过测试的 NodeJS 框架更高的性能，并且与 Go 不相上下， Go 是一种更接近于 C 的编译语言（<a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">全部归功于 Starlette</a>）。

### 并发比并行好吗？

不！这不是故事的本意。

并发不同于并行。而是在需要大量等待的特定场景下效果更好。因此，在 Web 应用程序开发中，它通常比并行要好得多，但这并不意味着全部。

pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct
pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct, Cmd LoadCmd
pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct, Len uint32
pkg debug/macho, type RpathCmd struct, Path uint32
pkg debug/macho, type Section struct, Relocs []Reloc
pkg encoding/asn1, const TagNumericString = 18
pkg encoding/asn1, const TagNumericString ideal-int
pkg encoding/asn1, func MarshalWithParams(interface{}, string) ([]uint8, error)

### Ist Nebenläufigkeit besser als Parallelität?

Nein! Das ist nicht die Moral der Geschichte.

   */
  // Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
  @SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
  public static long checkedMultiply(long a, long b) {
    // Hacker's Delight, Section 2-12
    int leadingZeros =
        Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(b)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~b);
    /*

func applyExpiryRule(event lifecycle.Event, src lcEventSrc, obj ObjectInfo) bool {
	globalExpiryState.enqueueByDays(obj, event, src)
	return true
}

// Perform actions (removal or transitioning of objects), return true the action is successfully performed
func applyLifecycleAction(event lifecycle.Event, src lcEventSrc, obj ObjectInfo) (success bool) {
	switch action := event.Action; action {

					Name:      "versions_scanned",
					Help:      "Total number of object versions checked for ilm actions since server uptime",
					Type:      counterMetric,
				},
				Value: float64(globalScannerMetrics.lifetime(scannerMetricILM)),
			},
		}
		for i := range globalScannerMetrics.actions {
			action := lifecycle.Action(i)
			v := globalScannerMetrics.lifetimeActions(action)
			if v == 0 {

			r = &GetObjectReader{
				ObjInfo:    oi,
				Reader:     inputReader,
				cleanUpFns: cFns,
			}
			return r, nil
		}
	}
	return fn, off, length, nil
}

// Close - calls the cleanup actions in reverse order
func (g *GetObjectReader) Close() error {
	if g == nil {
		return nil
	}
	// sync.Once is used here to ensure that Close() is
	// idempotent.
	g.once.Do(func() {

does not guarantee they will be satisfied. Both the “hard” and “soft” variants
of node affinity use the new syntax. Documentation is [here](http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/node-selection/) (see section “Alpha feature in Kubernetes v1.2: Node Affinity“). Design doc is [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.2/docs/design/nodeaffinity.md).

   */
  // Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
  @SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
  public static long checkedMultiply(long a, long b) {
    // Hacker's Delight, Section 2-12
    int leadingZeros =
        Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~a)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(b)
            + Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(~b);
    /*