* to support DFS referral _to_ Win95/98/ME.
         */

        // Optimization: Prefer SMB2 approach for better performance
        if (th.isSMB2()) {
            // SMB2: Use optimized open with minimal access for better performance
            return (SmbBasicFileInfo) withOpen(th, Smb2CreateRequest.FILE_OPEN, SmbConstants.FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES,

     * the current count of the element in the multiset, depending on the implementation. Note that
     * in the former case, this method can never return zero, while in the latter, it will return
     * zero if all occurrences of the element were since removed from the multiset.
     *
     * @return the count of the element; never negative
     */
    int getCount();

    /**

   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> According to our
   * benchmarking
   * on Open JDK 7, {@link #immutableSortedCopy} generally performs better (in both time and space)
   * than this method, and this method in turn generally performs better than copying the list and
   * calling {@link Collections#sort(List)}.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): rerun benchmarks including new options

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi">
    <img src="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/fastapi/fastapi.svg" alt="Coverage">
</a>

</p>
<p align="center">
<a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions?query=workflow%3ATest+event%3Apush+branch%3Amaster">
    <img src="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/actions/workflows/test.yml/badge.svg?event=push&branch=master" alt="Test">
</a>
<a href="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/redirect/fastapi/fastapi">
    <img src="https://coverage-badge.samuelcolvin.workers.dev/fastapi/fastapi.svg" alt="Coverage">
</a>

```

## `APIRouter` { #apirouter }

Vamos supor que o arquivo dedicado a lidar apenas com usuários seja o submódulo em `/app/routers/users.py`.

Você quer manter as *operações de rota* relacionadas aos seus usuários separadas do restante do código, para mantê-lo organizado.

Mas ele ainda faz parte da mesma aplicação/web API **FastAPI** (faz parte do mesmo "pacote Python").

func (s *xlStorage) getDeleteAttribute() uint64 {
	attr := "user.total_deletes"
	buf, err := xattr.LGet(s.formatFile, attr)
	if err != nil {
		// We start off with '0' if we can read the attributes
		return 0
	}
	return binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(buf[:8])
}

func (s *xlStorage) getWriteAttribute() uint64 {
	attr := "user.total_writes"
	buf, err := xattr.LGet(s.formatFile, attr)
	if err != nil {

    }
  }

  /*
   * We've split testFuzzyCompare() into multiple tests so that our internal Android test runner has
   * a better chance of completing each within its per-test-method timeout.
   */

  public void testFuzzyCompare0() {
    runTestFuzzyCompare(0);
  }

  public void testFuzzyCompare1() {
    runTestFuzzyCompare(1);

    * This will be used by the **automatic docs**.
    * It will also be used by automatic client code generation tools.
* **Serialize** the returned data to JSON using Pydantic, which is written in **Rust**, so it will be **much faster**.

But most importantly:

* It will **limit and filter** the output data to what is defined in the return type.
    * This is particularly important for **security**, we'll see more of that below.

OpenAPI では operation ID は全ての *path operation* を通して一意である必要があります。そのため FastAPI は**関数名**、**パス**、**HTTP メソッド/オペレーション**を組み合わせて operation ID を生成し、一意性を保証します。

次にこれを改善する方法を示します。🤓

## カスタム operation ID とより良いメソッド名 { #custom-operation-ids-and-better-method-names }

operation ID の**生成方法**を**変更**して簡潔にし、クライアント側の**メソッド名をシンプル**にできます。

この場合でも各 operation ID が**一意**であることは別の方法で保証する必要があります。