*       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

        assertEquals(1, docList.size());
        assertEquals(0, deletedDocIdList.size());

        deletedDocIdList.clear();
        oldDocList.add(new HashMap<>(Map.of(//
                "_id", "001", // same id
                "config_id", "W01", //
                "doc_id", "1", //
                "url", "http://test.com/001"//
        )));
        documentSizeByQuery = oldDocList.size();

	s = strings.ReplaceAll(s, SlashSeparator, "_")
	s = strings.ReplaceAll(s, "-", "_")
	return "minio_" + s
}

// isDescendantOf returns true if it is a descendant of (or the same as)
// `ancestor`.
//
// For example:
//
//	 	/a, /a/b, /a/b/c are all descendants of /a.
//		/abc or /abd/a are not descendants of /ab.
func (cp collectorPath) isDescendantOf(arg string) bool {

	SkipRebalancing bool

	SrcPoolIdx int // set by PutObject/CompleteMultipart operations due to rebalance; used to prevent rebalance src, dst pools to be the same

	DataMovement bool // indicates an going decommisionning or rebalacing

	PrefixEnabledFn func(prefix string) bool // function which returns true if versioning is enabled on prefix

changes on the source object version, such as metadata updates via PutObjectTagging, PutObjectRetention, PutObjectLegalHold and COPY api are replicated in a similar manner to target version, with the `X-Amz-Replication-Status` again cycling through the same states.

The description above details one way replication from source to target w.r.t incoming object uploads and metadata changes to source object version. If active-active replication is configured, any incoming uploads and metadata changes...

    task.cancel(false);
    assertTrue(task.isDone());
    assertTrue(task.isCancelled());
    assertEquals(1, runLatch.getCount());

    // Wait for the listeners to be called, don't rely on the same-thread exec.
    listenerLatch.await(5, SECONDS);
    assertTrue(task.isDone());
    assertTrue(task.isCancelled());

    // Make sure we didn't run anything.
    assertEquals(1, runLatch.getCount());
  }