Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1731896744 +0100

Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1731896744 +0100

    val multipart =
      """
      |--simple boundary
      |
      |abcd
      |--simple boundary--
      """.trimMargin()
        .replace(Regex("(?m)simple boundary$"), "simple boundary \t \t")
        .replace("\n", "\r\n")

    val parts =
      MultipartReader(
        boundary = "simple boundary",
        source = Buffer().writeUtf8(multipart),
      )

## Declaring types { #declaring-types }

You just saw the main place to declare type hints. As function parameters.

This is also the main place you would use them with **FastAPI**.

### Simple types { #simple-types }

You can declare all the standard Python types, not only `str`.

You can use, for example:

* `int`
* `float`
* `bool`
* `bytes`

---

But for this example, we'll use a very simple HTML document with some JavaScript, all inside a long string.

This, of course, is not optimal and you wouldn't use it for production.

In production you would have one of the options above.

But it's the simplest way to focus on the server-side of WebSockets and have a working example:

  }

  protected final E e0() {
    return samples.e0();
  }

  protected final E e1() {
    return samples.e1();
  }

  protected final E e2() {
    return samples.e2();
  }

  protected final E e3() {
    return samples.e3();
  }

  protected final E e4() {
    return samples.e4();
  }

## Simple HTTP Basic Auth { #simple-http-basic-auth }

* Import `HTTPBasic` and `HTTPBasicCredentials`.
* Create a "`security` scheme" using `HTTPBasic`.
* Use that `security` with a dependency in your *path operation*.
* It returns an object of type `HTTPBasicCredentials`:
    * It contains the `username` and `password` sent.

/// tip

Having the return model ensure that a value is always available and always `int` (not `None`) is very useful for the API clients, they can write much simpler code having this certainty.

Also, **automatically generated clients** will have simpler interfaces, so that the developers communicating with your API can have a much better time working with your API. 😎

///

## Custom Operation IDs and Better Method Names { #custom-operation-ids-and-better-method-names }

You can **modify** the way these operation IDs are **generated** to make them simpler and have **simpler method names** in the clients.

In this case, you will have to ensure that each operation ID is **unique** in some other way.

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server